Cited by 35SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchDisaster Response and ManagementInfection Control in Healthcare

Nurses fighting against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong

Chan, Sophia·2003·Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00209.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, S.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chan, Sophia
Venue
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
209-209
ISSN
  • 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6546
  • 1547-5069
OpenAlex
W2013839436
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 16
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
SARS, nurses, nursing workforce, outbreak response, Hong Kong SARS outbreak, occupational health of nurses
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Disease Outbreaks, Health Personnel, Hong Kong, Humans, Occupational Diseases, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, Nurse's Role, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review