Cited by 174Sleep and related disordersPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Translating the insomnia severity index into Arabic

Suleiman, Khaled H., Yates, Bernice C.·2011·Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to translate the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) into Arabic (Fusha dialect), and obtain preliminary reliability and validity estimates for the translated version. BACKGROUND: Arabic populations experience sleep problems that interfere with their vitality and quality of life. The ISI was established to screen for insomnia in both clinical and research situations. DESIGN: This study used a descriptive correlational design. The ISI was translated into Arabic using the back-translation method and compared with three other sleep measures: the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and the Vitality Subscale from the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36. These measures were administered to 35 healthy Arabic bilingual participants from three community locations. FINDINGS: The mean ISI score was 9.2 (SD = 5.8; range 0-20). Internal consistency reliability was 0.84. The correlations between the total ISI score and the single items ranged from 0.49 to 0.92 (p < .01). In terms of convergent validity, the total ISI score showed a strong positive correlation with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global score (r = 0.76, p < .001) and a moderate, negative correlation with vitality (r = -0.38, p =.026). CONCLUSIONS: The translated ISI demonstrated adequate reliability and validity. The translated ISI needs further testing in a larger sample of both clinical and healthy Arabic populations in their own countries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Preliminary psychometric estimates show that the translated ISI is reliable and valid in this community-dwelling Arabic sample. The translated ISI allows for Arabic researchers to screen for insomnia and plan for future intervention studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01374.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suleiman, K. H., & Yates, B. C.
Affiliations
  • Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan (JO)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Nursing Scholarship
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-04
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
49-53
ISSN
  • 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-6546
  • 1547-5069
OpenAlex
W2078011077
Cited by
174
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Insomnia Severity Index, Arabic translation, cross-cultural adaptation, insomnia screening, sleep quality, psychometric validation, reliability statistics, convergent validity, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, vitality, Arabic-speaking populations
MeSH terms
Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Middle East, Psychometrics, Severity of Illness Index, Translations, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review