Cited by 327Disability Rights and RepresentationAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support Research

From Cure to Community: Transforming Notions of Autism

Bagatell, Nancy·2010·Ethos

Abstract

For many decades, autism has been viewed as a biomedical condition, highlighting deficits in social interaction and communication. Based on ethnographic data from a study of adults with High Functioning Autism, this article explores the emergence of the autistic community, a group composed of people with autism, who are challenging these notions. First, I suggest that three historical trends can be linked to the emergence of this community: the widening of the autism spectrum, the strengthening of the self‐advocacy movement, and the explosion of technology. Drawing from ethnographic data, I describe the community, including its discourse, occupations or activities, and lexicon. Although the autistic community has grown over the past decade, it has also faced resistance from both inside and outside the group. I investigate this tension, arising in a debate regarding whether autism is a condition in need of a cure or a way of life and suggest that the autistic community has the power to transform notions of autism. Implications of this research for psychological anthropology's notions of sociality are introduced. [autism, community, social model of disability, occupation]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01080.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mismatch between what is currently being researched, what community members want from research and who gets to make these decisions may well be contributing to the growing distrust of mainstream autism science by the broader community.

    “But the mismatch between what is currently being researched, what community members want from research and who gets to make these decisions may well be contributing to the growing distrust of mainstream autism science by the broader community (Bagatell, 2010; Dawson, 2004; Lory, 2019; Milton, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bagatell, N.
Affiliations
Quinnipiac University (US)
Corresponding author
Bagatell, Nancy
Venue
Ethos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
33-55
ISSN
  • 0091-2131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1352
OpenAlex
W2085448344
Cited by
327
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethos (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic community, high-functioning autism, autism discourse, social model of disability, sociality, psychological anthropology, autistic adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review