Cited by 8Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support Research

Mapping the Needs of Adults with Autism and Co-Morbid Intellectual Disability

Open access
van Dooren, Kate, McPherson, Lyn, Lennox, Nick·2016·Current Developmental Disorders Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40474-016-0071-0

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Dooren, K., McPherson, L., & Lennox, N.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
McPherson, Lyn
Venue
Current Developmental Disorders Reports
Published
2016-01-26
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
82-89
ISSN
2196-2987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2298688504
Cited by
8
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Developmental Disorders Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, comorbidities, autistic adults, physical health, health needs, health-related quality of life, research gaps, evidence-based recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review