Cited by 1,798Indigenous Studies in Latin AmericaLatin American Cultural PoliticsIndigenous Cultures and History

INDIGENOUS COSMOPOLITICS IN THE ANDES: Conceptual Reflections beyond “Politics”

Open access
de la CADENA, MARISOL·2010·Cultural Anthropology

Abstract

In Latin America indigenous politics has been branded as “ethnic politics.” Its activism is interpreted as a quest to make cultural rights prevail. Yet, what if “culture” is insufficient, even an inadequate notion, to think the challenge that indigenous politics represents? Drawing inspiration from recent political events in Peru—and to a lesser extent in Ecuador and Bolivia—where the indigenous–popular movement has conjured sentient entities (mountains, water, and soil—what we call “nature”) into the public political arena, the argument in this essay is threefold. First, indigeneity, as a historical formation, exceeds the notion of politics as usual, that is, an arena populated by rational human beings disputing the power to represent others vis-à-vis the state. Second, indigeneity's current political emergence—in oppositional antimining movements in Peru and Ecuador, but also in celebratory events in Bolivia—challenges the separation of nature and culture that underpins the prevalent notion of politics and its according social contract. Third, beyond “ethnic politics” current indigenous movements, propose a different political practice, plural not because of its enactment by bodies marked by gender, race, ethnicity or sexuality (as multiculturalism would have it), but because they conjure nonhumans as actors in the political arena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agricultural work celebrations, such as the cleaning of the irrigation canals and ditches and associated rituals, are materialisations of customary beliefs relating to water as a being rather than a thing and a being in need of human labour (ritual and economic) to reproduce it.

    “Agricultural work celebrations, such as the cleaning of the irrigation canals and ditches and associated rituals, are materialisations of customary beliefs relating to water as a being rather than a thing and a being in need of human labour (ritual and economic) to reproduce it (Gelles 2002;De La Cadena 2010).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de la CADENA, M.
Venue
Cultural Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
334-370
ISSN
  • 0886-7356 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1360
OpenAlex
W2031322854
Cited by
1,798
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 126 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 184 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 174 · 2019: 155 · 2018: 193 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 31
FWCI
993.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Cultural Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
indigenous politics, indigeneity, nature and culture, social contract, ethnic politics, cultural rights, plurinationalism, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review