INDIGENOUS COSMOPOLITICS IN THE ANDES: Conceptual Reflections beyond “Politics”
Open accessAbstract
In Latin America indigenous politics has been branded as “ethnic politics.” Its activism is interpreted as a quest to make cultural rights prevail. Yet, what if “culture” is insufficient, even an inadequate notion, to think the challenge that indigenous politics represents? Drawing inspiration from recent political events in Peru—and to a lesser extent in Ecuador and Bolivia—where the indigenous–popular movement has conjured sentient entities (mountains, water, and soil—what we call “nature”) into the public political arena, the argument in this essay is threefold. First, indigeneity, as a historical formation, exceeds the notion of politics as usual, that is, an arena populated by rational human beings disputing the power to represent others vis-à-vis the state. Second, indigeneity's current political emergence—in oppositional antimining movements in Peru and Ecuador, but also in celebratory events in Bolivia—challenges the separation of nature and culture that underpins the prevalent notion of politics and its according social contract. Third, beyond “ethnic politics” current indigenous movements, propose a different political practice, plural not because of its enactment by bodies marked by gender, race, ethnicity or sexuality (as multiculturalism would have it), but because they conjure nonhumans as actors in the political arena.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Agricultural work celebrations, such as the cleaning of the irrigation canals and ditches and associated rituals, are materialisations of customary beliefs relating to water as a being rather than a thing and a being in need of human labour (ritual and economic) to reproduce it.
“Agricultural work celebrations, such as the cleaning of the irrigation canals and ditches and associated rituals, are materialisations of customary beliefs relating to water as a being rather than a thing and a being in need of human labour (ritual and economic) to reproduce it (Gelles 2002;De La Cadena 2010).”
From Contested value and an ethics of resources: Water, mining and indigenous people in the Atacama Desert, Chile (2016) · cites this paper as De La Cadena 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Babidge, S. (2016) · The Australian Journal of Anthropology · doi:10.1111/taja.12139 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
There might be blood: oil, humility, and the cosmopolitics of a Cofán petro-being
CEPEK, M. L. (2016) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1111/amet.12379 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Mining indigenous territories: Consensus, tensions and ambivalences in the Salar de Atacama
Lorca, M., Olivera Andrade, M., Escosteguy, M., Köppel, J., Scoville-Simonds, M., & Hufty, M. (2022) · The Extractive Industries and Society · doi:10.1016/j.exis.2022.101047 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Lazar, S. (2022) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/14634996211030196 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- de la CADENA, M.
- Venue
- Cultural Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 334-370
- ISSN
- 0886-7356 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1360
- OpenAlex
- W2031322854
- Cited by
- 1,798
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 126 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 184 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 174 · 2019: 155 · 2018: 193 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 993.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cultural Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- indigenous politics, indigeneity, nature and culture, social contract, ethnic politics, cultural rights, plurinationalism, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review