Cited by 215Global Educational Policies and ReformsSchool Choice and PerformanceEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

Neo-Liberalism, Markets and Accountability: Transforming Education and Undermining Democracy in the United States and England

Open access
Hursh, David·2005·Policy Futures in Education

Abstract

Education in both England and the United States has undergone a profound change over the last two decades as part of neo-liberal and neoconservative political reforms. The reforms have been characterized by efforts to standardize the curriculum, to implement standardized tests in order to hold students, teachers, and schools accountable, to increase school choice, and to privatize education provision. While the reforms in both countries have similarities, differences in the structures of schooling and in the relative political strength of neoconservatives and neo-liberals help to account for policy divergence.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article argues that education reforms in the United States and England since the 1980s reflect neo-liberal and neoconservative agendas centered on markets, choice, standards, testing, accountability, and privatization. It contends these reforms undermine democratic public schooling and fail to achieve their stated goals of equity and improved education.

Key findings

  • Both countries standardized curricula and assessments, expanded school choice, and increased privatization, though England implemented choice more fully through open enrollment and the effective dissolution of Local Education Authorities, while the US retained more state and local authority until No Child Left Behind (NCLB).
  • Neo-liberal markets in education depend on state regulation rather than being self-regulating: standardized testing and reporting, such as New York “school report cards” or England’s “league tables,” are necessary to make choice and competition operate.
  • The reforms exacerbate inequality: in 2003 in New York, 83% of failing schools were in the five largest cities; in England, open enrollment and league tables advantage schools with more advantaged students and disadvantage those serving low-income, disabled, and English-language-learner students.
  • Privatization expanded through vouchers, charter schools, and private tutoring: the Bush administration granted US$77.6 million from 2001 to 2003 to groups promoting voucher programs, supported a US$50 million experimental voucher program in Washington, DC, and under NCLB failing schools’ funds could go to private tutoring providers receiving up to US$2000 per child.

Methods

  • Comparative policy analysis and critical essay synthesizing secondary literature, policy documents, and prior studies rather than presenting new empirical data.
  • The paper compares the US and England across five themes: choice/markets, curricular standards, assessment and accountability, diversity, and privatization, summarized in Table I.
  • It draws on cited research and examples, including NCLB, England’s Education Reform Act 1988, national curriculum, GCSEs, league tables, open enrollment, grant-maintained schools, and charter schools.

Limitations

  • The paper states it is a short article that “cannot do justice” to the issues and that it risks “greatly oversimplifying” the social and economic changes.
  • Evident from the text: it relies heavily on secondary sources and selected examples rather than systematic original data collection or causal analysis.
  • Evident from the text: its scope is limited to the US and England and to developments through the early 2000s, so findings may not generalize to other systems or later policy changes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.6

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 45 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Markets do not solve the problem of adequately preparing students given unequal institutions, inadequate funding, and the focus on preparing students for tests rather than the complex and varied skills required for real learning.

    “Markets, argue Thrupp & Willmott, do not solve the problem of adequately preparing students given our unequal institutions, inadequate funding, and the focus on preparing students for tests rather than the complex and varied skills required for real learning (Thrupp & Willmott, 2003, p. 236).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Thrupp & Willmott, 2003, p. 236
  • Premisecitation

    All markets, ranging from international trade, to local farmers' markets, to school choice, depend on the state for regulation.

    “However, as Thrupp & Willmott point out, all markets, ranging from international trade, to local farmers' markets, to school choice, depend on the state for regulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Thrupp & Willmott, 2003
  • Findingcitation

    Studies by Ball, Bowe et al, Gewirtz et al, and Ball et al demonstrate that choice policies increase social class segregation in schools.

    “Studies by Ball (1990Ball ( , 2003)), Bowe et al (1992), Gewirtz et al (1995) and Ball et al (1996) demonstrate that choice policies increase social class segregation in schools (cited in Tomlinson, 2001, p. 73).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ball

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Bowe et al

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gewirtz et al

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    Under NCLB, public schools that fail to make adequate yearly progress for five years can be converted into charter schools.

    “Under NCLB, public schools that fail to make AYP for five years can be converted into charter schools.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Businesses' net rate of profit fell by more than 50% between 1965 and 1974.

    “as workers earned and spent more, businesses' net rate of profit fell by more than 50% between 196550% between and 197450% between (Parenti, 1999, p. 118), p. 118).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Parenti, 1999 source
  • May combine two claims. 42
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the United States, the implementation of standards and standardized testing in states such as Texas and New York has resulted in more students leaving school, students living in poverty and students of color being forced out of school, and increasing disparity between the wealthier and poorer districts.

    “In the United States, the implementation of standards and standardized testing in states such as Texas and New York has resulted in more students leaving school, students living in poverty and students of color being forced out of school, and increasing disparity between the wealthier and poorer districts (Haney, 2000;Orfield et al, 2004;Winter, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Haney, 2000 source

      The section “Emphasis on TAAS contributes to retention in grade and dropping out of school” says Texas testing contributed to students leaving school, and “Emphasis on TAAS is particularly harmful to at-risk students” describes concerns about lower-income students. The paper also reports disproportionately poor progression for Black and Hispanic students in “Hazards of High Stakes Testing.” These passages do not establish the claim about New York or increasing disparities between wealthier and poorer districts; the evidence on lower-income students also does not specifically show that they were forced out of school. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Orfield et al, 2004
    • cites Winter, 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Both the United States and Great Britain have managed to introduce a market system into education, although England has implemented choice to a greater degree through open enrollment and the effective dissolution of the Local Education Authorities.

    “Both countries have managed to introduce a market system into education, although England, through its open enrollment and the effective dissolution of the Local Education Authorities (LEAs), has implemented choice to a greater degree.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Eighteen states made graduation contingent on passing one or more standardized exams.

    “Eighteen states made graduation contingent on passing one or more of the standardized exams.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    England, in an effort to ostensibly raise standards, has implemented more stringent curriculum requirements compared to the United States, and requires subject-area tests at several stages.

    “England, in an effort to ostensibly raise standards, has implemented more stringent curriculum requirements compared to the United States, and requires subject-area tests at several stages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Standardized tests were introduced as part of the Education Reform Act of 1988 as a means to measure pupil performance at the end of four Key Stages and to make it possible for market forces to operate by providing a currency of information to fuel competition between schools.

    “Standardized tests were introduced as part of the Education Reform Act of 1988 as a means to 'measure the performance of pupils at the end of four Key Stages, but also to make it possible for market forces to operate by providing a currency of information which would fuel competition between schools' (Broadfoot, 2001, p. 142).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Broadfoot, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In the United States, the authors of A Nation at Risk connected education to the economy by explicitly blaming schools for the Reagan-induced economic recession of the early 1980s and for the United States falling behind other countries economically.

    “Similarly, in the United States, the authors of A Nation at Risk (National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1982) connected education to the economy by explicitly blaming schools for the Reagan-induced economic recession of the early 1980s (Parenti, 1999) and for the United States falling behind other countries economically (Hursh & Apple, 1983).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Parenti, 1999 source
    • cites Hursh & Apple, 1983

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In Rochester, the third largest district in New York, all the middle schools and most of the high schools are 'failing'.

    “In Rochester, the third largest district in New York, all the middle schools and most of the high schools are 'failing'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Gewirtz shows that the already advantaged school is able to retain and attract more capable students while the school struggling to meet the needs of its low-income and migrant students cannot attract students and must accept the students excluded from the favored schools.

    “Gewirtz shows how the already advantaged school is able to retain and attract more capable students while the school struggling to meet the needs of its low-income and migrant students cannot attract students and must accept the students excluded from the favored schools (p.66).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gewirtz

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    By 2001, of the 50 states, all but one had curricular standards and many had standardized tests.

    “Beginning in the 1990s, states began developing curricular standards and standardized tests so that by 2001, of the 50 states, all but one had standards and many had standardized tests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    In the United States, choice and competition have increased within school districts, particularly urban districts that use specialty schools as a way to balance integration throughout the district and retain middle-class and white students within the district.

    “In the United States, choice and competition have increased within school districts, particularly urban districts (i.e.districts composed of a majority of students who are of color and/or poor) that use specialty schools as a way to balance integration throughout the district and retain middle-class and white students within the district.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In 2003 in New York, 83% of the failing schools were located in the five largest cities and most of the remaining failing schools were in smaller urban areas.

    “In 2003 in New York, 83% of the failing schools were located in the five largest cities and most of the remaining failing schools were in smaller urban areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Following the passage of NCLB in 2001, all states are required to have subject-area standards and standardized exams.

    “Following the passage of NCLB in 2001, all states are required to have subject-area standards and standardized exams.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The national curriculum in England is to occupy some 70 percent of school time in state schools and is accompanied by standard assessment tasks to be implemented at four Key Stages.

    “The national curriculum is 'to occupy some 70 percent of school time in state schools' and is accompanied by standard assessment tasks (SATs) to be implemented at four Key Stages (Tomlinson, 2001, p. 56).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tomlinson, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    By the late 1980s there was widespread agreement that some form of national curriculum was desirable and the perceived value of standardized assessments of nationally prescribed school knowledge was necessary to devolve more power to schools and to hold them accountable.

    “But Edwards describes how by the late 1980s there was widespread agreement that some form of national curriculum was desirable and the perceived value of standardized assessments of nationally prescribed school knowledge was necessary to devolve more power to schools and to hold them accountable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Edwards, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Under NCLB all states are now required to develop standards and to give standardized tests in math, reading, and science.

    “However, under NCLB all states are now required to develop standards and to give standardized tests in math, reading, and science.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning

    In states such as New York, the combination of federal and state testing requirements results in students facing a minimum of 33 standardized exams during their school career.

    “In states such as New York, the combination of federal and state testing requirements results in students facing a minimum of 33 standardized exams during their school career.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Neo-liberal governments desire to reduce funding for education while at the same time reorganizing education to fit the needs of the economy.

    “Neo-liberal governments, therefore, desire to reduce funding for education while at the same time reorganizing education to fit the needs of the economy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Under neo-liberal post-welfare policies, inequality is a result of individuals' inadequacy, to be remedied by requiring individuals to become productive members of the workforce.

    “Under neo-liberal post-welfare policies, inequality is a result of individuals' inadequacy, which is to be remedied not by increasing dependency through social welfare, but by requiring that individuals strive to become productive members of the workforce.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In education, state regulation of markets exists in the form of standardized testing and reporting (school report cards in New York or league tables in England) and bureaucratic structures in which preferences are recorded and selections made.

    “In education such regulation exists in the form of standardized testing and reporting (whether as 'school report cards' in New York or 'league tables' in England), and bureaucratic structures in which preferences are recorded and selections made.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Neo-liberal governments retain legitimacy by blaming schools for the essential injustices and contradictions of capitalism, while they preserve inequalities through other policies such as taxation and reductions in social spending.

    “Another way in which neo-liberal governments are able to retain their legitimacy is by blaming schools for the essential injustices and contradictions of capitalism, while they preserve inequalities through other policies such as taxation and reductions in social spending (Dale, 1989).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dale, 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In England, choice exists, but choice exists more for some than others.

    “In England choice exists, but choice exists more for some than others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Because 'success' or 'failure' has nothing to do with whether a school's scores are rising or falling but with whether the scores reach a rising minimum threshold, 'failing schools' are largely confined to districts that have large percentages of students living in poverty.

    “Because 'success' or 'failure' has nothing to do with whether a school's scores are rising or falling but with whether the scores reach a rising minimum threshold, 'failing schools' are largely confined to those districts that have large percentages of students living in poverty (for more on how improving schools can be found to be 'failing' and declining schools can be found to be 'succeeding',”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hursh & Martina, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Choice within urban districts essentially redistributes students within schools already burdened with students with special needs or for whom English is a second language.

    “However, choice within urban districts essentially redistributes students within schools already burdened with students with special needs or for whom English is a second language.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The curriculum and accompanying tests continue to impact strongly the work of teachers and students, most significantly ending the influence teachers, students, parents, governors, LEAs, and independent bodies have on the curriculum.

    “However, the curriculum and accompanying tests continue to impact strongly the work of teachers and students, most significantly ending the influence teachers, students, parents, governors, LEAs, and independent bodies have on the curriculum.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neo-liberalism emphasizes deregulation of the economy, trade liberalization, dismantling of the public sector, and predominance of the financial sector over production and commerce.

    “In order to restore higher rates of profit, corporate and political leaders promoted neo-liberal policies that emphasize 'the deregulation of the economy, trade liberalization, the dismantling of the public sector [such as education, health, and social welfare], and the predominance of the financial sector of the economy over production and commerce' (Vilas, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vilas, 1996 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the range of political rationales, the neo-liberal alternative dominates, as does a particular emphasis on market mechanisms.

    “Whitty et al analyzed the changing educational system in five countries and conclude that 'within the range of political rationales, it is the neo-liberal alternative which dominates, as does a particular emphasis on market mechanisms' (p.35).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Whitty et al

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because the public might object to cuts in social spending and increasing economic inequality, neo-liberal policy makers have packaged the reforms to make it appear that they are promoting equality.

    “Because the public might object to cuts in social spending and increasing economic inequality, neo-liberal policy makers have skillfully packaged the reforms to make it appear that they are promoting equality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The public might object to cuts in social spending and increasing economic inequality.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Neo-liberal governments take less responsibility for the welfare of the individual; the individual becomes responsible for him or herself.

    “Neo-liberal governments take less responsibility for the welfare of the individual; the individual becomes responsible for him or herself.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The reforms in both countries have been characterized by efforts to standardize the curriculum, implement standardized tests to hold students, teachers, and schools accountable, increase school choice, and privatize education provision.

    “The reforms have been characterized by efforts to standardize the curriculum, to implement standardized tests in order to hold students, teachers, and schools accountable, to increase school choice, and to privatize education provision.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because the reforms focus on turning schools into competitive markets in which students apply to the school they want to attend, children and their parents no longer have shared interests with other students and families and may become competitors for available openings.

    “Because, as I will describe, the reforms focus on turning schools into competitive markets in which students apply to the school they want to attend, children and their parents no longer have shared interests with other students and families and, instead, may become competitors for the available openings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neo-liberalism stresses privatization of public provision, deregulating private producers, greater pursuit of profit, and less regard for limiting social costs or redistribution based on nonmarket criteria.

    “Tabb wrote that neo-liberalism stresses the privatization of the public provision of goods and services -moving their provision from the public sector to the private -along with deregulating how private producers can behave, giving greater scope to the single-minded pursuit of profit and showing significantly less regard for the need to limit social costs or for redistribution based on nonmarket”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tabb, 2002
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    School choice, as promoted in the United States by the No Child Left Behind Act and in England by open enrollments, encourages parents to transfer their children from school to school, therefore undermining their allegiance to the local school and the incentive to engage in public discourse regarding the nature and purpose of schooling.

    “However, school choice, as promoted in the United States by the No Child Left Behind Act (2001) (NCLB) and in England by open enrollments, encourages parents to transfer their children from school to school, therefore undermining their allegiance to the local school and the incentive to engage in public discourse regarding the nature and purpose of schooling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the past, most students attended the local school to which they were assigned, learned from teachers who used and adapted the school's and district's curriculum, and were evaluated based primarily on teacher-prepared assessments.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The aim of neoliberalism is to put into question all collective structures capable of obstructing the logic of the pure market.

    “The aim of neoliberalism is to put into question all collective structures capable of obstructing the logic of the pure market.(Tabb, 2002, p. 7)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tabb, 2002
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Current educational policies arise out of the need for governments to retain legitimacy by appearing to be doing something about increasing economic inequality, to support capital accumulation through reduction of taxes and education of workers, and, particularly for neoconservatives, to regain social control.

    “I will argue that the current educational policies arise out of the need for governments to retain legitimacy by appearing to be doing something about the increasing economic inequality, to support capital accumulation through the reduction of taxes and the education of workers, and, particularly for neoconservatives in response to the social unrest of the 1960s and 1970s, to regain social control”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gewirtz, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    For policy makers in England, diversity refers to freeing schools from their local authorities, in particular the LEAs, which in some places, such as London, promoted progressive and equitable educational reforms.

    “While one might assume that the goal of diversity includes responding to and attracting a diverse student body, for policy makers in England diversity refers to freeing schools from their local authorities, in particular the LEAs, which in some places, such as London, promoted progressive and equitable educational reforms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    School district officials and parents are revealing that some tutoring programs are recruiting students with gifts such as computers and then, after receiving up to US$2000 from the federal government for each child, are failing to deliver services.

    “School district officials and parents are revealing that some programs are recruiting students with gifts such as computers and then, after receiving up to US$2000 from the federal government for each child, are failing to deliver services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saulny, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    After failing to convince the State Education Department through documents and artifacts demonstrating their students' success, the 28 New York high schools brought a lawsuit against the state and lost at three court levels.

    “After failing to convince the State Education Department through documents and artifacts demonstrating their students' success, the schools brought a lawsuit against the state, only to lose at the three court levels (Hursh & Martina, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hursh & Martina, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While the reforms are promoted as guaranteeing a quality education for all, because particularly in the United States the tests are flawed and because the culture of testing and choice is leading to increasing disparity between schools, the stated goals are unobtainable.

    “Lastly, while the reforms are promoted as guaranteeing a quality education for all, because, particularly in the United States, the tests are flawed and because the culture of testing and choice is leading to increasing disparity between schools, the stated goals are unobtainable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In England, corporations can sponsor specialist schools, and through their sponsorship gain the ability to appoint the majority of the school board and control the direction and curriculum of the school.

    “Corporations can sponsor 'specialist schools', and through their sponsorship gain the ability to appoint the majority of the school board and control the direction and curriculum of the school.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Peterson, 2004, p. 32

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The new policies leave numerous contradictions and tensions unresolved, which create openings for more progressive reforms.

    “However, the new policies leave numerous contradictions and tensions unresolved, which create openings for more progressive reforms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The long-range plan for the federal government may be to replace public schools with private schools.

    “While the federal and state governments may be limiting the flexibility and creativity with which public schools can approach teaching and the curriculum, the long-range plan for the federal government may be to replace public schools with private.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Socially conservative and neo-liberal foundations and think tanks heavily influence the Bush administration.
    • Rests on an assumption: Leaders from these organizations advise and move in and out of leadership positions in the Bush administration, forming the brain trust behind the administration's support for educational markets and privatization of public education.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Many have noted the contradiction between both countries' stated goal of promoting education innovation through competitive markets while at the same time limiting innovation through curriculum and assessment requirements.

    “Many have noted the contradiction between both countries' stated goal of promoting education innovation through competitive markets while at the same time limiting innovation through curriculum and assessment requirements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Neo-liberal reforms can be criticized for not improving education and resulting in increasing inequality.

    “In particular, neo-liberal reforms can be criticized for not improving education and resulting in increasing inequality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While grant-maintained schools no longer have to follow local requirements, they still must abide by the national curriculum and the standardized tests, therefore limiting their innovation.

    “While grant-maintained schools no longer have to follow local requirements, they still must abide by the national curriculum and the standardized tests, therefore limiting their innovation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Opportunity does not equal equality and, under capitalism, with its need for profit and expanding markets, not only does not promote equality but also undermines it, as those who have capital in economic, cultural, and social forms are in the best position to gain from it.

    “However, opportunity does not equal equality and, as Levitas points out, under capitalism, with its need for profit and expanding markets, not only does not promote equality but also undermines it, as those who have capital -in whatever form: economic, cultural, and social -are in the best position to gain from it (Levitas, 1998, p. 188).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Levitas, 1998, p. 188
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    While the federal government aims to hold public schools accountable, there is no effort to develop regulations and to hold accountable the private tutoring companies.

    “Further, while the federal government aims to hold public schools accountable, there is no effort to develop regulations and to hold accountable the private tutoring companies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saulny, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In England education is seen as an opportunity for corporations to produce human capital for competitiveness in the global economy and to open up state education systems to private education-for-profit companies.

    “Similarly, in England education is seen as an opportunity for corporations to 'produce human capital for competitiveness in the global economy' and 'to open up state education systems to private education-for-profit companies' (Hatcher, 2003, p. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hatcher, 2003, p. 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Not only does the market system exacerbate the inequalities between schools, but the competitive examination system also exacerbates inequalities within schools.

    “Moreover, note Gillborn & Youdell, not only does the market system exacerbate the inequalities between schools, but the competitive examination system also exacerbates inequalities within schools.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gillborn & Youdell, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Department of Education has thrown its support behind privatization by allocating funds to organizations that promote vouchers and to a US$50 million experimental voucher program in Washington, DC.

    “The Department of Education, to an unprecedented degree, has thrown its support behind privatization by allocating funds to organizations that promote vouchers and to a US$50 million experimental voucher program in Washington, DC (Miner, 2004, p. 9).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Miner, 2004, p. 9

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The second neo-liberal policy contradiction is between desiring competitive markets to promote innovation and diversity while constraining innovation by curriculum standards, in England by a national curriculum and high-stakes standardized tests.

    “The second contradiction is between desiring competitive markets to promote innovation and diversity while constraining innovation by curriculum standards: in England by a national curriculum and highstakes standardized tests.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The third neo-liberal policy contradiction is that markets are meant to promote competitive individualism, but some governments, most notably the Blair government's efforts to develop an inclusive society and the Clinton administration's notion that it takes a village to raise a child, have realized that individualism can be carried to an extreme.

    “Third, markets are meant to promote competitive individualism; however, some governments, most notably the Blair government's efforts to develop an 'inclusive society' and the Clinton administration's notion that 'it takes a village to raise a child', have realized that individualism can be carried to an extreme.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While neo-liberals and neoconservatives argued that market forces would promote diversity in the school curriculum and pedagogy, instituting curriculum requirements and standardized tests has undermined possibilities for such innovation.

    “Second, while neo-liberals and neoconservatives argued that market forces would promote diversity in the school curriculum and pedagogy, instituting curriculum requirements and standardized tests has undermined possibilities for such innovation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the past, most students attended the local school to which they were assigned, learned from teachers who used and adapted the school's and district's curriculum, and were evaluated based primarily on teacher-prepared assessments.

    “While not desiring to romanticize the past, not long ago most students attended the local school to which they were assigned, learned from teachers who used and adapted the school's and district's curriculum, and were evaluated based primarily on teacher-prepared assessments.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The public might object to cuts in social spending and increasing economic inequality.

    “Because the public might object to cuts in social spending and increasing economic inequality, neo-liberal policy makers have skillfully packaged the reforms to make it appear that they are promoting equality.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Standardized exams typically tested for only a small percentage of the standards.

    “Standardized exams typically tested for only a small percentage of the standards.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Schools in the United States have had a long history of local control, with families committed to making a school work because the school was the community school.

    “Schools in the United States have had a long history of local control, with families committed to making a school work because the school was the community school.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Socially conservative and neo-liberal foundations and think tanks heavily influence the Bush administration.

    “Socially conservative and neo-liberal foundations and think tanks heavily influence the Bush administration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Leaders from these organizations advise and move in and out of leadership positions in the Bush administration, forming the brain trust behind the administration's support for educational markets and privatization of public education.

    “Leaders from these organizations advise and move in and out of leadership positions in the current Bush administration, forming the 'brain trust' behind the administration's support for educational markets and the privatization of public education.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    From 2001 to 2003 the Bush administration granted US$77.6 million to groups dedicated to privatization through voucher programs.

    “Furthermore, from 2001 to 2003 the Bush administration granted US$77.6 million to groups dedicated to privatization through voucher programs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    These groups aim to replace public schools with private schools.

    “These groups aim to replace public schools with private schools.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neoconservatives have also desired to control the curriculum.

    “Further, neoconservatives have also desired to control the curriculum.”
9 of 9

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bowles S., 1986, Democracy and Capitalism: Property, community, and the contradictions of modern thought
  2. Broadfoot P., 2001, Education Reform and the State: Twenty-five years of politics, policy, and practice
  3. Campbell G., 2001, Education Reform and the State: Twenty-five years of politics, policy, and practice
  4. Edwards T., 2001, Education Reform and the State: Twenty-five years of politics, policy, and practice
  5. Furlong J., 2001, Education Reform and the State: Twenty-five years of politics, policy, and practice
  6. Hursh D., Martina C.A. (2002) Resisting the Tyranny of Tests: The battle for New York, paper presented at the Discourse Power Resistance conference, Plymouth, 12–14 April.
  7. Hursh D., 2003, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1
  8. Miner B., 2004, Rethinking Schools, 18, 9
  9. National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1982, A Nation at Risk: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education
  10. Peters M., 1994, Discourse, 14, 65
  11. Peterson B., 2004, Rethinking Schools, 18, 31
  12. Phillips R., 2001, Education Reform and the State: Twenty-five years of politics, policy, and practice
  13. Robertson S., 2000, A Class Act: Changing teachers' work, the state, and globalizaton
  14. Robertson S., 2001, Education Reform and the State: Twenty-five years of politics, policy, and practice
  15. US Department of Education, 2002, What to Know and Where to Go: A parents' guide to No Child Left Behind
  16. US Department of Education, 2002, No Child Left Behind: A desk reference
  17. Vilas C., 1996, NACLA Report on the Americas, 29, 16

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hursh, D.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Hursh, David
Venue
Policy Futures in Education
Published
2005-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
3-15
ISSN
1478-2103 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107497788
Cited by
215
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Policy Futures in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Keywords
neoliberalism, education policy reform, school accountability, standardized testing, curriculum standardization, school choice, privatization of education, neoconservatism, democracy, American education, policy divergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review