CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multisited Research on Colonowares and the Paradox of Globalization

Cobb, Charles R., DePratter, Chester B.·2012·American Anthropologist
DOI 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01445.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multisited ethnography was advanced by George Marcus (1995) as a way to address the spatial reach of communities linked by global flows of commodities, peoples, and institutions. Although the approach is usually applied within the context of modern globalization, many of the processes that define globalization accelerated with the onset of European colonization in the 1400s C.E. Multisited research is particularly suited to the analysis of the “paradox of globalization,” the simultaneous unfolding of heterogeneity and homogeneity throughout the world, which became pervasive in the colonial era. An indigenous ceramic type in eastern North America known as colonoware expresses this paradox, where variable European influence in its morphology and surface treatment can be attributed to the intersection of local practices and large‐scale population movements. [colonoware, globalization, colonialism]

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01445.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. Anthony Ronald W, 2002, Another's Country: Archaeological and Historical Perspectives on Cultural Interactions in the Southern Colonies, 45
  2. 10.1215/08992363-2-2-1 · DOI
  3. Beardsell Peter, 2000, Europe and Latin America: Returning the Gaze
  4. 10.1525/an.2008.49.5.15.2 · DOI
  5. Bhabha Homi, 1994, The Location of Culture
  6. Binford Lewis R, 1965, Colonial Period Ceramics of the Nottoway and Weanock Indians of Southeastern Virginia, Quarterly Bulletin, Archaeological Society of Virginia, 19, 78
  7. Bowne Eric E, 2005, The Westo Indians: Slave Traders of the Early Colonial Southeast
  8. Brighton Stephen A, 2009, Historical Archaeology of the Irish Diaspora: A Transnational Approach
  9. Brilliant M. Brooke2011Colonoware Creolization and Interactions between African Americans and Native Americans during the Colonial Period in the South Carolina Lowcountry.M.A. thesis Department of Anthropology University of South Carolina Columbia .
  10. Brown Ian, 1992, Calumet & Fleur‐De‐Lys: Archaeology of Indian and French Contact in the Midcontinent, 17
  11. 10.1086/659102 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00419.x · DOI
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511617690.007 · DOI
  14. Cook Joanna, 2009, Multi‐Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research, 47
  15. Cooper Leslie, 2007, Regional Variation in Colonoware Manufacture and Use
  16. Cordell Ann S, 2001, Continuity and Change in Apalachee Pottery Manufacture: A Technological Comparison of Apalachee‐Style and Colono Ware Pottery from French Colonial Old Mobile and Mission San Luis de Talimali
  17. Cordell Linda, 2006, Social Lives of Pots, 253
  18. Crane Brian D, 1993, Colono Ware and Criollo Ware Pottery from Charleston, South Carolina and San Juan, Puerto Rico in Comparative Perspective
  19. Crook Morgan R., 1990, Rae's Creek: A Multicomponent Archaeological Site at the Fall Line along the Savannah River
  20. Deetz James, 1993, Flowerdew Hundred: The Archaeology of a Virginia Plantation, 1619–1864
  21. Deetz James, 1996, In Small Things Forgotten: An Archaeology of Early American Life (revised)
  22. DePratter Chester B, 2003, The Savannah River Valley to 1865, 15
  23. Eastman Jane, 1996, Indian Pottery of the Carolinas, 116
  24. Edgar Walter B., 1998, South Carolina: A History
  25. Edney Matthew H, 1999, Geography and Enlightenment, 165
  26. Eisenstadt S. N., 2000, Multiple Modernities, Daedalus, 129, 1
  27. Elliot Daniel T., 1990, Mount Pleasant: An Eighteenth‐Century Yuchi Indian Town, British Trader Outpost, and Military Garrison in Georgia
  28. 10.1086/300126 · DOI
  29. Ethridge Robbie, 2006, Light on the Path: The Anthropology and History of the Southeastern Indians, 207
  30. Everett C. S., 2010, Indian Slavery in Colonial America, 67
  31. Falzon Mark‐Anthony, 2009, Multi‐Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research, 1
  32. Falzon Mark‐Anthony, 2009, Multi‐Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research
  33. Ferguson Leland1978Looking for the “Afro” in Colono Indian Pottery. Conference on Historic Sites Archaeology Papers Volume12. Columbia SC :South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology.
  34. Ferguson Leland, 1989, Studies in South Carolina Archaeology: Essays in Honor of Robert L. Stephenson, 185
  35. Ferguson Leland, 1992, Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African America, 1650–1800
  36. 10.1007/s11133-005-9005-6 · DOI
  37. Foster H. Thomas, 2004, Evidence of Historic Indian Creek Indian Migration from a Regional and Direct Historic Analysis of Ceramic Types, Southeastern Archaeology, 23, 65
  38. Foster H. Thomas, 2007, Archaeology of the Lower Muskogee Creek Indians, 1715–1836
  39. 10.1007/s10761-009-0082-1 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Gallay Alan, 2002, The Indian Slave Trade: The Rise of the English Empire in the American South, 1670–1717
  41. Gosden Chris, 2003, Archaeology and Colonialism: Cultural Contact from 5000 BC to the Present
  42. Green Jack P., 1989, Selling a New World: Two Colonial South Carolina Promotional Pamphlets
  43. Gullapalli Praveena, 2008, Archaeology and the Post‐Colonial Critique, 35
  44. 10.1177/1463499605059232 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/14661381030042003 · DOI
  46. Harrison Rodney, 2004, After Captain Cook: The Archaeology of the Recent Indigenous Past in Australia, 37
  47. Hauser Mark. W., 2008, An Archaeology of Black Markets: Local Ceramics and Local Economies in Eighteenth‐Century Jamaica
  48. Herbert Joseph M., 1996, Indian Pottery of the Carolinas, 136
  49. Johnson Matthew, 1996, An Archaeology of Capitalism
  50. 10.1007/978-0-387-72071-5_3 · DOI
  51. Joseph J. W., 2007, One More Look into the Water–Colonoware in South Carolina's Rivers and Charleston's Market Economy, The African Diaspora Archaeology Network Newsletter, 1
  52. 10.1080/01459740802640909 · DOI
  53. Knauft Bruce M, 2002, Critically Modern: Alternatives, Alterities, Anthropologies, 1
  54. Knight Vernon James, 1985, Tukabatchee: Archaeological Investigations at an Historic Creek Town, Elmore County, Alabama, 1984. Office of Archaeological Research, Alabama State Museum of Natural History Report of Investigations 45
  55. Knight Vernon James, 1994, Ocmulgee Archaeology, 1936–1986, 181
  56. Leitch Wright L., 1981, The Only Land They Knew: American Indians in the Old South
  57. 10.2307/282137 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Mason Carol, 2005, The Archaeology of Ocmulgee Old Fields, Macon, Georgia
  60. 10.1023/A:1016080520656 · DOI
  61. Meyer Brigit, 1999, Globalization and Identity: Dialectics of Flow and Closure, 1
  62. Morgan David W., 2011, French Colonial Archaeology in the Southeast and Caribbean, 117
  63. Mouer L. Daniel, 1999, “I, Too, Am America”: Archaeological Studies of African‐American Life, 83
  64. Mullins Paul, 2000, Representing Colonizers: An Archaeology of Creolization, Ethnogenesis, and Indigenous Material Culture among the Haida, Historical Archaeology, 34, 73, 10.1007/BF03373643 · DOI
  65. Needham Maggie2011Cultural Pluralism Migration and Ceramics: Reconsidering an Eighteenth Century Yuchi Settlement on the Savannah River (9EF169).M.A. thesis Department of Anthropology University of South Carolina Columbia .
  66. 10.3998/jar.0521004.0064.201 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Nöel Hume Ivor, 1962, An Indian Ware of the Colonial Period, Quarterly Bulletin, Archaeological Society of Virginia, 17, 2
  68. Nyman James A.2011The Ashley Series as Native American Persistence: Lowcountry Indians in the Period of European Expansion.M.A. thesis Department of Anthropology University of South Carolina Columbia .
  69. Oatis Steven J, 2004, A Colonial Complex: South Carolina's Frontiers in the Era of the Yamasee War
  70. Olsen Bjørner, 2001, Destruction and Conservation of Cultural Property, 42
  71. 10.1007/978-1-4757-8988-1 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Patterson Thomas C, 2008, Archaeology and the Post‐Colonial Critique, 21
  73. Ramsey William L, 2008, The Yamasee War: A Study of Culture, Economy, and Conflict in the Colonial South, 10.2307/j.ctt1dgn402 · DOI
  74. Renfrew Colin, 1978, The Evolution of Social Systems, 89
  75. 10.1179/sea.2010.29.1.003 · DOI
  76. Rolland Vicki L., 2000, Beneath the Bell: A Study of Mission Period Colonoware from Three Spanish Missions in Northeast Florida, Florida Anthropologist, 53, 36
  77. Roseberry William, 1989, Anthropologies and Histories: Essays in Culture, History, and Political Economy
  78. 10.1086/244606 · DOI
  79. Shennan Stephen, 1978, The Spatial Organization of Culture, 113
  80. 10.1017/S0002731600048575 · DOI
  81. Singleton Theresa A., 2000, Lines that Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender, 3
  82. 10.2307/275299 · DOI
  83. Smith Marvin T, 1987, Archaeology of Aboriginal Culture Change in the Interior Southeast: Depopulation During the Early Historic Period
  84. Smith Marvin T, 1989, Powhatan's Mantle: Indians in the Colonial Southeast, 21
  85. South Stanley, 1977, Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology
  86. 10.1007/978-1-4615-1349-0 · DOI
  87. Stahl Ann Brower, 2008, Invisible Citizens: Captives and their Consequences, 25
  88. Stark Miriam T, 2006, Social Lives of Pots, 17
  89. Steen Carl, 2009, The Settlement Indians of South Carolina
  90. 10.1007/BF03376839 · DOI
  91. Thomas Daniel H, 1989, Fort Toulouse: The French Outpost at the Alabamas on the Coosa
  92. Trinkley Michael, 2003, Archaeology at the Eighteenth Slave Settlement in Goose Creek, South Carolina
  93. Vernon Richard, 1988, 17th Century Apalachee Colono‐Ware as a Reflection of Demography, Economics, and Acculturation, Historical Archaeology, 22, 76, 10.1007/BF03374502 · DOI
  94. Vernon Richard, 1993, The Spanish Missions of La Florida, 418
  95. 10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.461 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1086/591275 · DOI
  97. Waselkov Gregory A, 1992, Calumet & Fleur‐de‐Lys: Archaeology of Indian and French Contact in the Midcontinent, 35
  98. Weir Robert M., 1997, Colonial South Carolina: A History
  99. Wheaton Thomas, 1989, Studies in South Carolina Archaeology: Essays in Honor of Robert L, 185
  100. 10.1525/9780520944589 · DOI
  101. Willey Gordon R., 1958, Method and Theory in American Archaeology
  102. Wood Peter H, 1974, Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina, from 1670 through the Stono Rebellion
  103. 10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1172 · DOI
  104. 10.1525/aa.2005.107.4.563 · DOI · Paper page
  105. 10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.148 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cobb, C. R., & DePratter, C. B.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-21
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
446-461
ISSN
  • 0002-7294
  • 1548-1433
DOI
10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01445.x
Cited by
26
References
3
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review