The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?1
Abstract
Abstract Using data obtained from National Opinion Research Center's General Social Surveys (1973–1990), this paper tests two hypotheses concerning possible changes in the sociopolitical correlates of environmental concern. The “broadening base” hypothesis predicts that environmental concern will diffuse throughout the populace, resulting in a broader base of support for environmental protection, while the “economic contingency” hypothesis predicts that the economically deprived will disproportionately withdraw support for environmental protection during poor economic conditions. Analysis of the data over the 18 years, however, failed to lend any clear support for either of the hypotheses. In marked contrast, results indicate that the social bases of environmental concern—at least as measured by the NORC environmental spending item—have remained remarkably stable over nearly two decades despite fluctuating economic, political, and environmental conditions. Younger adults, the well‐educated, political liberals, Democrats, those raised and currently living in urban areas, and those employed outside of primary industries were found to be consistently more supportive of environmental protection than were their respective counterparts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
Self-citationAssessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil
Echegaray, F., & Hansstein, F. V. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.064 · Cited by 509
Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/714000580 · Cited by 432
Self-citationBoard gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2326 · Cited by 365
Collective Action and Citizen Responses to Global Warming
Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2007) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E.
- Venue
- Rural Sociology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-47
- ISSN
- 0036-0112 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-0831
- OpenAlex
- W2137272642
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x
- The paper
- Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?1. Rural Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.