Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Babesia Canis Canis, Babesia Canis Vogeli, Babesia Canis Rossi: Differentiation of the Three Subspecies By A Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis On Amplified Small Subunit Ribosomal Rna Genes

CARRET, CÉLINE, WALAS, FABIEN, CARCY, BERNARD, GRANDE, NATHALIE, PRÉCIGOUT, ÉRIC, MOUBRI, KARINA, SCHETTERS, THEO P., GORENFLOT, ANDRÉ·1999·Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The parasites Babesia canis and Babesia gibsoni (phylum Apicomplexa) are responsible for canine babesiosis throughout the world. Babesia canis was previously described as a group of three biologically different subspecies, namely B. canis canis. B. canis vogeli, and B. canis rossi. We report partial sequences of small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (ssu‐rDNA) of each subspecies amplified in vitro with primers derived from a semi‐conserved region of the ssu‐rDNA genes in other Babesia species. the polymerase chain reaction combined with a restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, using Hinfl and Taql restriction enzymes, confirmed the separation of B. canis into three subspecies. These sequences were compared with previously published sequences of other Babesia species. A phylogenetic approach showed that the three subspecies of B. canis belong to the clade of Babesia species sensu stricto where B. canis canis clusters with B. canis rossi whereas B. canis vogeli might form a monophyletic group with the cluster B. divergens and B. odocoilei. Our results show that the three subspecies of B. canis can readily be differentiated at the molecular level and suggest that they might be considered as true species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb05128.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
CARRET, C., WALAS, F., CARCY, B., GRANDE, N., PRÉCIGOUT, É., MOUBRI, K., SCHETTERS, T. P., & GORENFLOT, A.
Venue
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-05
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
298-301
ISSN
  • 1066-5234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7408
OpenAlex
W1995173991
Cited by
182
References
1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Babesia Canis Canis, Babesia Canis Vogeli, Babesia Canis Rossi: Differentiation of the Three Subspecies By A Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis On Amplified Small Subunit Ribosomal Rna Genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb05128.x
The paper
CARRET, C., WALAS, F., CARCY, B., GRANDE, N., PRÉCIGOUT, É., MOUBRI, K., SCHETTERS, T. P., & GORENFLOT, A. (1999). Babesia Canis Canis, Babesia Canis Vogeli, Babesia Canis Rossi: Differentiation of the Three Subspecies By A Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis On Amplified Small Subunit Ribosomal Rna Genes. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb05128.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.