Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy Crossovers in Nanocrystalline Zirconia

Pitcher, Michael W., Ushakov, Sergey V., Navrotsky, Alexandra, Woodfield, Brian F., Li, Guangshe, Boerio‐Goates, Juliana, Tissue, Brian M.·2005·Journal of the American Ceramic Society

Abstract

The synthesis of nanocrystalline powders of zirconia often produces the tetragonal phase, which for coarse‐grained powders is stable only at high temperatures and transforms into the monoclinic form on cooling. This stability reversal has been suggested to be due to differences in the surface energies of the monoclinic and tetragonal polymorphs. In the present study, we have used high‐temperature oxide melt solution calorimetry to test this hypothesis directly. We measured the excess enthalpies of nanocrystalline tetragonal, monoclinic, and amorphous zirconia. Monoclinic ZrO 2 was found to have the largest surface enthalpy and amorphous zirconia the smallest. Stability crossovers with increasing surface area between monoclinic, tetragonal, and amorphous zirconia were confirmed. The surface enthalpy of amorphous zirconia was estimated to be 0.5 J/m 2 . The linear fit of excess enthalpies for nanocrystalline zirconia, as a function of area from nitrogen adsorption (BET) gave apparent surface enthalpies of 6.4 and 2.1 J/m 2 , for the monoclinic and tetragonal polymorphs, respectively. Due to aggregation, the surface areas calculated from crystallite size are larger than those measured by BET. The fit of enthalpy versus calculated total interface/surface area gave surface enthalpies of 4.2 J/m 2 for the monoclinic form and 0.9 J/m 2 for the tetragonal polymorph. From solution calorimetry, the enthalpy of the monoclinic to tetragonal phase transition for ZrO 2 was estimated to be 10±1 kJ/mol and amorphization enthalpy to be 34±2 kJ/mol.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00031.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Pitcher, M. W., Ushakov, S. V., Navrotsky, A., Woodfield, B. F., Li, G., Boerio‐Goates, J., & Tissue, B. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12-29
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
160-167
ISSN
  • 0002-7820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-2916
OpenAlex
W2103059205
Cited by
295
References
15
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy Crossovers in Nanocrystalline Zirconia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00031.x
The paper
Pitcher, M. W., Ushakov, S. V., Navrotsky, A., Woodfield, B. F., Li, G., Boerio‐Goates, J., & Tissue, B. M. (2005). Energy Crossovers in Nanocrystalline Zirconia. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00031.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.