Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge Translation

Graham, Ian D., Tetroe, Jacqueline, KT Theories Research Group·2007·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

A careful analysis of the definition of knowledge translation highlights the importance of the judicious translation of research into practice and policy. There is, however, a considerable gap between research and practice. Closing the research‐to‐practice gap involves changing clinical practice, a complex and challenging endeavor. There is increasing recognition that efforts to change practice should be guided by conceptual models or frameworks to better understand the process of change. The authors conducted a focused literature search, developed inclusion criteria to identify planned action theories, and then extracted data from each theory to determine the origins, examine the meaning, judge the logical consistency, and define the degree of generalizability, parsimony, and testability. An analysis was conducted of the concepts found in each theory, and a set of action categories was developed that form the phases of planned action. Thirty‐one planned action theories were identified that formed the basis of the analyses. An Access database was created, as well as a KT Theories User's Guide that synthesizes all the planned change models and theories, identifies common elements of each, and provides information on their use. There are many planned change models and frameworks with many common elements and action categories. Whenever any planned change model is used, change agents should consider documenting their experiences with the model so as to advance understanding of how useful the model is and to provide information to others who are attempting a similar project.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02369.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Grimshaw J., 2001, Oxford Handbook of Public Health
  2. Agency for Health Research and Quality, Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP)‐II
  3. 10.1097/00003727-198605000-00003 · doi:10.1097/00003727-198605000-00003
  4. Lekander BJ, 1994, Overcoming the obstacles to research‐based clinical practice, AACN Clin Issues, 5, 115
  5. 10.1016/S0196-0644(97)70081-7 · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70081-7
  6. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02365.x · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02365.x
  7. Stiell I., 1996, Ottawa ankle rules, Can Fam Physician, 42, 478
  8. Rogers EM., 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
  9. McDonald K., 2004, Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Practices (Vol. 1: diabetes mellitus and hypertension)
  10. Barnum B., 1998, Nursing Theory: Analysis, Applications, Evaluations
  11. Rogers EM., 1995, Diffusion of Innovations
  12. Lomas J., 1994, Disseminating Research/Changing Practice, 1
  13. Walker L., 2005, Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Graham, I. D., Tetroe, J., & KT Theories Research Group
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
936-941
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2107792325
Cited by
323
References
27
FWCI
27.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge Translation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02369.x
The paper
Graham, I. D., Tetroe, J., & KT Theories Research Group. (2007). Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge Translation. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02369.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.