The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge Translation
Abstract
A careful analysis of the definition of knowledge translation highlights the importance of the judicious translation of research into practice and policy. There is, however, a considerable gap between research and practice. Closing the research‐to‐practice gap involves changing clinical practice, a complex and challenging endeavor. There is increasing recognition that efforts to change practice should be guided by conceptual models or frameworks to better understand the process of change. The authors conducted a focused literature search, developed inclusion criteria to identify planned action theories, and then extracted data from each theory to determine the origins, examine the meaning, judge the logical consistency, and define the degree of generalizability, parsimony, and testability. An analysis was conducted of the concepts found in each theory, and a set of action categories was developed that form the phases of planned action. Thirty‐one planned action theories were identified that formed the basis of the analyses. An Access database was created, as well as a KT Theories User's Guide that synthesizes all the planned change models and theories, identifies common elements of each, and provides information on their use. There are many planned change models and frameworks with many common elements and action categories. Whenever any planned change model is used, change agents should consider documenting their experiences with the model so as to advance understanding of how useful the model is and to provide information to others who are attempting a similar project.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement
Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P.-A. C., & Rubin, H. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 · Cited by 6,677
Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?
Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.47 · Cited by 4,705
Self-citationWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 1×
“Promoting the use of research findings prematurely can risk causing more harm than benefit.(2) Knowledge synthesis is one important way to ensure that the knowledge to be transferred is both valid and reliable.”
BackgroundEnabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework.
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998) · Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.7.3.149 · Cited by 1,985
(1999) · Cited by 1,648
Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress
Pearson, B. D., & Meleis, A. I. (1985) · The American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.2307/3425219 · Cited by 877
Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework
Rycroft-Malone, J. (2002) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.11.2.174 · Cited by 701
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Grimshaw J., 2001, Oxford Handbook of Public Health
- Agency for Health Research and Quality, Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP)‐II
- 10.1097/00003727-198605000-00003 · doi:10.1097/00003727-198605000-00003
- Lekander BJ, 1994, Overcoming the obstacles to research‐based clinical practice, AACN Clin Issues, 5, 115
- 10.1016/S0196-0644(97)70081-7 · doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70081-7
- 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02365.x · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02365.x
- Stiell I., 1996, Ottawa ankle rules, Can Fam Physician, 42, 478
- Rogers EM., 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
- McDonald K., 2004, Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Practices (Vol. 1: diabetes mellitus and hypertension)
- Barnum B., 1998, Nursing Theory: Analysis, Applications, Evaluations
- Rogers EM., 1995, Diffusion of Innovations
- Lomas J., 1994, Disseminating Research/Changing Practice, 1
- Walker L., 2005, Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing
Cited by
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research
Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180 · Cited by 3,340
Jull, J., Giles, A., & Graham, I. D. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3 · Cited by 651
Self-citationDeveloping a Framework for Transferring Knowledge Into Action: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature
Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120 · Cited by 511
An implementation research agenda
Eccles, M. P., Armstrong, D., Baker, R., Cleary, K., Davies, H., Davies, S., Glasziou, P., Ilott, I., Kinmonth, A.-L., Leng, G., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-18 · Cited by 481
“Fourth, frameworks are potentially useful tools for considering the issues that a research agenda needs to address [13].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, I. D., Tetroe, J., & KT Theories Research Group
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 936-941
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W2107792325
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 27.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge Translation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02369.x
- The paper
- Graham, I. D., Tetroe, J., & KT Theories Research Group. (2007). Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge Translation. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02369.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.