The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graduate Medical Education and Knowledge Translation: Role Models, Information Pipelines, and Practice Change Thresholds
Abstract
This article reflects the proceedings of a workshop session, Postgraduate Education and Knowledge Translation, at the 2007 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on knowledge translation (KT) in emergency medicine (EM). The objective was to develop a research strategy that incorporates KT into EM graduate medical education (GME). To bridge the gap between the best evidence and optimal patient care, Pathman et al. suggested a multistage model for moving from evidence to action. Using this theoretical knowledge-to-action framework, the KT consensus conference group focused on four key components: acceptance, application, ability, and remembering to act on the existing evidence. The possibility that basic familiarity, along with the pipeline by Pathman et al., may improve KT uptake may be an initial starting point for research on GME and KT. Current residents are limited by faculty GME role models to demonstrate bedside KT principles. The rapid uptake of KT theory will depend on developing KT champions locally and internationally for resident physicians to emulate. The consensus participants combined published evidence with expert opinion to outline recommendations for identifying the barriers to KT by asking four specific questions: 1) What are the barriers that influence a resident's ability to act on valid health care evidence? 2) How do we break down these barriers? 3) How do we incorporate this into residency training? 4) How do we monitor the longevity of this intervention? Research in the fields of GME and KT is currently limited. GME educators assume that if we teach residents, they will learn and apply what they have been taught. This is a bold assumption with very little supporting evidence. This article is not an attempt to provide a complete overview of KT and GME, but, instead, aims to create a starting point for future work and discussions in the realm of KT and GM.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The research pipeline contains many effective programs and treatments in a backlog, waiting to be implemented.
“The research ‘pipeline’ [28-30] contains many effective programs and treatments in a backlog, waiting to be implemented.”
From Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients (2012) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., & Kerr, E. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa022615 · Cited by 5,079
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care
Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14546-1 · Cited by 4,531
Davis, D., O'Brien, M. A. T., Freemantle, N., Wolf, F. M., Mazmanian, P., & Taylor-Vaisey, A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.9.867 · Cited by 2,364
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., Baumann, A. A., Hamilton, A. M., & Santens, R. L. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-96 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Diner, B. M., Carpenter, C. R., O'Connell, T., Pang, P., Brown, M. D., Seupaul, R. A., Celentano, J. J., Mayer, D., & Members, K.-C. T. I.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Regions Hospital (US)
- Hong Kong College of Emergency Medicine (HK)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Lincoln Medical Center (US)
- Albany Medical College (US)
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1008-1014
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W1998536791
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Keywords
- knowledge translation, graduate medical education, emergency medicine residency, knowledge-to-action framework, role models, faculty role models, medical residents, practice change, evidence-based practice, emergency medicine education
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Diffusion of Innovation, Emergency Medicine, Health Services Research, Humans, Internship and Residency, Evidence-Based Medicine, Knowledge, Information Dissemination, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review