Cited by 61Health Sciences Research and EducationInnovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical Research Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Graduate Medical Education and Knowledge Translation: Role Models, Information Pipelines, and Practice Change Thresholds

Diner, Barry M., Carpenter, Christopher R., O'Connell, Tara, Pang, Peter, Brown, Michael D., Seupaul, Rawle A., Celentano, James J., Mayer, Dan, KT-CC Theme IIIa Members·2007·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

This article reflects the proceedings of a workshop session, Postgraduate Education and Knowledge Translation, at the 2007 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on knowledge translation (KT) in emergency medicine (EM). The objective was to develop a research strategy that incorporates KT into EM graduate medical education (GME). To bridge the gap between the best evidence and optimal patient care, Pathman et al. suggested a multistage model for moving from evidence to action. Using this theoretical knowledge-to-action framework, the KT consensus conference group focused on four key components: acceptance, application, ability, and remembering to act on the existing evidence. The possibility that basic familiarity, along with the pipeline by Pathman et al., may improve KT uptake may be an initial starting point for research on GME and KT. Current residents are limited by faculty GME role models to demonstrate bedside KT principles. The rapid uptake of KT theory will depend on developing KT champions locally and internationally for resident physicians to emulate. The consensus participants combined published evidence with expert opinion to outline recommendations for identifying the barriers to KT by asking four specific questions: 1) What are the barriers that influence a resident's ability to act on valid health care evidence? 2) How do we break down these barriers? 3) How do we incorporate this into residency training? 4) How do we monitor the longevity of this intervention? Research in the fields of GME and KT is currently limited. GME educators assume that if we teach residents, they will learn and apply what they have been taught. This is a bold assumption with very little supporting evidence. This article is not an attempt to provide a complete overview of KT and GME, but, instead, aims to create a starting point for future work and discussions in the realm of KT and GM.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb02381.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The research pipeline contains many effective programs and treatments in a backlog, waiting to be implemented.

    “The research ‘pipeline’ [28-30] contains many effective programs and treatments in a backlog, waiting to be implemented.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Diner, B. M., Carpenter, C. R., O'Connell, T., Pang, P., Brown, M. D., Seupaul, R. A., Celentano, J. J., Mayer, D., & Members, K.-C. T. I.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Regions Hospital (US)
  • Hong Kong College of Emergency Medicine (HK)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Lincoln Medical Center (US)
  • Albany Medical College (US)
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
1008-1014
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W1998536791
Cited by
61
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
knowledge translation, graduate medical education, emergency medicine residency, knowledge-to-action framework, role models, faculty role models, medical residents, practice change, evidence-based practice, emergency medicine education
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Diffusion of Innovation, Emergency Medicine, Health Services Research, Humans, Internship and Residency, Evidence-Based Medicine, Knowledge, Information Dissemination, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review