Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 550

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS

Lynch, Michael, Gabriel, Wilfried·1990·Evolution

Abstract

Previous attempts to model the joint action of selection and mutation in finite populations have treated population size as being independent of the mutation load. However, the accumulation of deleterious mutations is expected to cause a gradual reduction in population size. Consequently, in small populations random genetic drift will progressively overpower selection making it easier to fix future mutations. This synergistic interaction, which we refer to as a mutational melt‐down, ultimately leads to population extinction. For many conditions, the coefficient of variation of extinction time is less than 0.1, and for species that reproduce by binary fission, the expected extinction time is quite insensitive to population carrying capacity. These results are consistent with observations that many cultures of ciliated protozoans and vertebrate fibroblasts have characteristic extinction times. The model also predicts that clonal lineages are unlikely to survive more than 104 to 105 generations, which is consistent with existing data on parthenogenetic animals. Contrary to the usual view that Muller's ratchet does more damage when selection is weak, we show that the mean extinction time declines as mutations become more deleterious. Although very small sexual populations, such as self‐fertilized lines, are subject to mutational meltdowns, recombination effectively eliminates the process when the effective population size exceeds a dozen or so. The concept of the effective mutation load is developed, and several procedures for estimating it are described. It is shown that this load can be reduced substantially when mutational effects are highly variable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05244.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Angello J. C., 1985, Clonal attenuation in chick embryo fibroblasts, Cell Tissue Kinet., 18, 27
  2. 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90153-2 · doi:10.1016/0047-6374(84)90153-2
  3. 10.1016/0047-6374(86)90044-8 · doi:10.1016/0047-6374(86)90044-8
  4. Bell G., 1982, The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality
  5. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1988.1010067.x · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80027-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1025 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Crow J. F., 1983, The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, 2
  9. 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/BF00735583 · doi:10.1007/bf00735583
  11. 10.1086/280722 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90018-6 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/S0016672300018784 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0040-5809(88)90015-9 · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(88)90015-9
  15. 10.1242/jcs.66.1.401 · doi:10.1242/jcs.66.1.401
  16. 10.1214/aoms/1177706791 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/genetics/48.10.1303 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/336435a0 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.3420403 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1086/413902 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/genetics/120.3.791 · DOI
  22. 10.1086/284169 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Maynard Smith J., 1978, The Evolution of Sex
  24. Michod R. E., 1988, The Evolution of Sex
  25. 10.1016/B978-0-12-688850-8.50016-7 · DOI
  26. Muller H. J., 1950, Our load of mutations, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2, 111
  27. 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/0047-6374(74)90008-6 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.60.2.517 · DOI
  30. Nei M., 1983, Evolution of Genes and Proteins, 165
  31. 10.1017/S0016672300026938 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0531-5565(83)90034-7 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb04078.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0047-6374(79)90005-8 · doi:10.1016/0047-6374(79)90005-8
  35. 10.1016/0047-6374(77)90029-X · DOI
  36. 10.1126/science.424739 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61291-7 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1954.tb00792.x · DOI
  39. Sonneborn T. M.1957.Breeding systems reproductive methods and species problems in protozoa pp.155–324.InE.Mayr(ed.) The Species Problem. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Washington D.C.
  40. 10.1017/CBO9780511623400 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/0047-6374(87)90109-6 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1242/jcs.41.1.177 · doi:10.1242/jcs.41.1.177
  43. 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60529-1 · doi:10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60529-1
  44. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110345 · DOI

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Lynch, M., & Gabriel, W.
Venue
Evolution
Published
1990-11
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
1725-1737
ISSN
  • 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-5646
OpenAlex
W2084076901
Cited by
550
References
0
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BSR 86‐00487)
  • Presbyterian Historical Society (R01 GM36827‐01)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05244.x
The paper
Lynch, M., & Gabriel, W. (1990). MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05244.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.