The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS
Abstract
Previous attempts to model the joint action of selection and mutation in finite populations have treated population size as being independent of the mutation load. However, the accumulation of deleterious mutations is expected to cause a gradual reduction in population size. Consequently, in small populations random genetic drift will progressively overpower selection making it easier to fix future mutations. This synergistic interaction, which we refer to as a mutational melt‐down, ultimately leads to population extinction. For many conditions, the coefficient of variation of extinction time is less than 0.1, and for species that reproduce by binary fission, the expected extinction time is quite insensitive to population carrying capacity. These results are consistent with observations that many cultures of ciliated protozoans and vertebrate fibroblasts have characteristic extinction times. The model also predicts that clonal lineages are unlikely to survive more than 104 to 105 generations, which is consistent with existing data on parthenogenetic animals. Contrary to the usual view that Muller's ratchet does more damage when selection is weak, we show that the mean extinction time declines as mutations become more deleterious. Although very small sexual populations, such as self‐fertilized lines, are subject to mutational meltdowns, recombination effectively eliminates the process when the effective population size exceeds a dozen or so. The concept of the effective mutation load is developed, and several procedures for estimating it are described. It is shown that this load can be reduced substantially when mutational effects are highly variable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Angello J. C., 1985, Clonal attenuation in chick embryo fibroblasts, Cell Tissue Kinet., 18, 27
- 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90153-2 · doi:10.1016/0047-6374(84)90153-2
- 10.1016/0047-6374(86)90044-8 · doi:10.1016/0047-6374(86)90044-8
- Bell G., 1982, The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality
- 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1988.1010067.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80027-4 · DOI
- 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1025 · DOI · Paper page
- Crow J. F., 1983, The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, 2
- 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00735583 · doi:10.1007/bf00735583
- 10.1086/280722 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0047-6374(84)90018-6 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0016672300018784 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-5809(88)90015-9 · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(88)90015-9
- 10.1242/jcs.66.1.401 · doi:10.1242/jcs.66.1.401
- 10.1214/aoms/1177706791 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/genetics/48.10.1303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/336435a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.3420403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/413902 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/genetics/120.3.791 · DOI
- 10.1086/284169 · DOI · Paper page
- Maynard Smith J., 1978, The Evolution of Sex
- Michod R. E., 1988, The Evolution of Sex
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-688850-8.50016-7 · DOI
- Muller H. J., 1950, Our load of mutations, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2, 111
- 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0047-6374(74)90008-6 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.60.2.517 · DOI
- Nei M., 1983, Evolution of Genes and Proteins, 165
- 10.1017/S0016672300026938 · DOI
- 10.1016/0531-5565(83)90034-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb04078.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-6374(79)90005-8 · doi:10.1016/0047-6374(79)90005-8
- 10.1016/0047-6374(77)90029-X · DOI
- 10.1126/science.424739 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61291-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1954.tb00792.x · DOI
- Sonneborn T. M.1957.Breeding systems reproductive methods and species problems in protozoa pp.155–324.InE.Mayr(ed.) The Species Problem. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Washington D.C.
- 10.1017/CBO9780511623400 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0047-6374(87)90109-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jcs.41.1.177 · doi:10.1242/jcs.41.1.177
- 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60529-1 · doi:10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60529-1
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110345 · DOI
Cited by
Evolution Experiments with Microorganisms: The Dynamics and Genetic Bases of Adaptation
Elena, S. F., & Lenski, R. E. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1088 · Cited by 1,386
Domingo, E., Sheldon, J., & Perales, C. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.05023-11 · Cited by 1,009
Lande, R. (1995) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040782.x · Cited by 686
The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus.
Sanjuán, R., Moya, A., & Elena, S. F. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0400146101 · Cited by 582
A Quantitative-Genetic Perspective on Conservation Issues
Lynch, M. (1996) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2504-9_15 · Cited by 403
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, M., & Gabriel, W.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1725-1737
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2084076901
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 9708 d)
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (BSR 86‐00487)
- Presbyterian Historical Society (R01 GM36827‐01)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05244.x
- The paper
- Lynch, M., & Gabriel, W. (1990). MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05244.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.