The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SPECIATION BY REINFORCEMENT OF PREMATING ISOLATION
Abstract
The generation of premating isolation given partial or complete postzygotic isolation between populations is termed reinforcement or, in the case of complete isolation, reproductive character displacement. In this study we use computer simulations and a multilocus genetic model to reevaluate the theory of reinforcement. We consider the evolution of female preferences for a male secondary sexual trait. If the populations differ in mean female preference, there is direct selection on the preference for further divergence, which may be augmented by a correlated response to sexual selection on males. Two factors prevent divergence. First, if postzygotic isolation is not complete, gene flow can prevent divergence and lead to a hybrid swarm. This is the usual outcome whenever the average number of breeding adult offspring produced by a hybrid mating is sufficient to replace the parents. Second, one or the other population may become extinct because of the large number of hybrid matings it is involved in. The likelihood of extinction is lowered if population growth rates are high, if hybrids are inviable rather than infertile, or under some conditions when allopatric populations provide immigrants into the contact zone. Provided hybrid fitness is sufficiently low, there is a wide range of genetic and ecological conditions under which reinforcement rather easily occurs, and also a range under which it may occur because of stochastic effects on both the inheritance parameters and the population sizes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Cited by
Ecology and the origin of species
Schluter, D. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02198-x · Cited by 1,878
Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation
Kirkpatrick, M., & Barton, N. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.047985 · Cited by 1,178
The Role of Reinforcement in Speciation: Theory and Data
Servedio, M. R., & Noor, M. A. F. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412 · Cited by 939
Reproductive Interference Between Animal Species
Gröning, J., & Hochkirch, A. (2008) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/590510 · Cited by 594
Speciation by Natural and Sexual Selection: Models and Experiments
Kirkpatrick, M., & Ravigné, V. (2002) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/338370 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Liou, L. W., & Price, T. D.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1451-1459
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2322203148
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SPECIATION BY REINFORCEMENT OF PREMATING ISOLATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02187.x
- The paper
- Liou, L. W., & Price, T. D. (1994). SPECIATION BY REINFORCEMENT OF PREMATING ISOLATION. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02187.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.