The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DIRECT SELECTION ON LIFE SPAN IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Open accessAbstract
An important issue in the study of the evolution of aging in Drosophila melanogaster is whether decreased early fecundity is inextricably coupled with increased life span in selection experiments on age at reproduction. Here, this problem has been tackled using an experimental design in which selection is applied directly to longevity. Selection appeared successful for short and long life, in females as well as males. Progeny production of females selected for long life was lower than for short-lived females throughout their whole life. No increase of late-life reproduction in long-lived females occurred, as has been found in selection experiments on age at reproduction. This discrepancy is explained in terms of the inadequacy of the latter design to separate selection on life span from selection on late-life fecundity. Moreover, starvation resistance and fat content were lower for adults selected for short life. In general, the data support the negative-pleiotropy-disposable-soma theory of aging, and it is hypothesized that the pleiotropic allocation of resources to maintenance versus to reproduction as implicated in the theory might involve lipid metabolism. It is argued that further research on this suggestion is urgent and should certainly comprise observations on male reproduction because these are for the greater part still lacking. In conclusion, the longevity of D. melanogaster can be genetically altered in a direct-selection design, and such an increase is accompanied by a decreased general reproduction and thus early reproduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Cited by
Kirkwood, T. B. L., & Austad, S. N. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35041682 · Cited by 1,774
The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals
Zera, A. J., & Harshman, L. G. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114006 · Cited by 1,577
Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success
Westendorp, R. G. J., & Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/25519 · Cited by 607
An evolutionary perspective on the mechanisms of immunosenescence
Shanley, D. P., Aw, D., Manley, N. R., & Palmer, D. B. (2009) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2009.05.001 · Cited by 315
BUBLIY, O. A., & LOESCHCKE, V. (2005) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00928.x · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Zwaan, B., Bijlsma, R., & Hoekstra, R. F.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 649-659
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315751720
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DIRECT SELECTION ON LIFE SPAN IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02301.x
- The paper
- Zwaan, B., Bijlsma, R., & Hoekstra, R. F. (1995). DIRECT SELECTION ON LIFE SPAN IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02301.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.