The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EVOLUTION OF ENDOTHERMY: TESTING THE AEROBIC CAPACITY MODEL
Open accessAbstract
One of the most important events in vertebrate evolution was the acquisition of endothermy, the ability to use metabolic heat production to elevate body temperature above environmental temperature. Several verbal models have been proposed to explain the selective factors leading to the evolution of endothermy. Of these, the aerobic capacity model has received the most attention in recent years. The aerobic capacity model postulates that selection acted mainly to increase maximal aerobic capacity (or associated behavioral abilities) and that elevated resting metabolic rate evolved as a correlated response. Here we evaluate the implicit evolutionary and genetic assumptions of the aerobic capacity model. In light of this evaluation, we assess the utility of phenotypic and genetic correlations for testing the aerobic capacity model. Collectively, the available intraspecific data for terrestrial vertebrates support the notion of a positive phenotypic correlation between resting and maximal rates of oxygen consumption within species. Interspecific analyses provide mixed support for this phenotypic correlation. We argue, however, that assessments of phenotypic or genetic correlations within species and evolutionary correlations among species (from comparative data) are of limited utility, because they may not be able to distinguish between the aerobic capacity model and plausible alternatives, such as selection acting directly on aspects of thermoregulatory abilities. We suggest six sources of information that may help shed light on the selective factors important during the evolution of high aerobic metabolic rates and, ultimately, the attainment of endothermy. Of particular interest will be attempts to determine, using a combination of mechanistic physiological and quantitative-genetic approaches, whether a positive genetic correlation between resting and maximal rates of oxygen consumption is an ineluctable feature of vertebrate physiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x · Cited by 2,648
Evolution and Escalation: An Ecological History of Life
Vermeij, G. J. (1987) · doi:10.1515/9780691224244 · Cited by 1,154
Endothermy and Activity in Vertebrates
Bennett, A. F., & Ruben, J. A. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.493968 · Cited by 710
EVOLUTIONARY QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW?
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1989) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005 · Cited by 686 · cited 1×
“…from microevolutionary processes to macroevolution&y patterns (Lande 1979, 1985; Slatkin and Kirkpatrick 1986; Arnold 1987, 1992; but see Barton and Turelli 1989 and references therein), it does not address the possibility of qualitatively different macroevolutionary processes (e.g.,…”
BackgroundHarvey, P. H., & Krebs, J. R. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2196673 · Cited by 261
Genetic and Evolutionary Aspects of Allometry
Lande, R. (1985) · Size and Scaling in Primate Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3647-9_2 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Thermodynamic Effects on Organismal Performance: Is Hotter Better?
Angilletta, M. J., Huey, R. B., & Frazier, M. R. (2010) · Physiological and Biochemical Zoology · doi:10.1086/648567 · Cited by 353
Lovegrove, B. G. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Physiology B · doi:10.1007/s00360-002-0309-5 · Cited by 349
Farmer, C. G. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303323 · Cited by 264
White, C. R., & Seymour, R. S. (2004) · Physiological and Biochemical Zoology · doi:10.1086/425186 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayes, J. P., & Garland, T.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 836-847
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2315876743
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EVOLUTION OF ENDOTHERMY: TESTING THE AEROBIC CAPACITY MODEL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02320.x
- The paper
- Hayes, J. P., & Garland, T. (1995). THE EVOLUTION OF ENDOTHERMY: TESTING THE AEROBIC CAPACITY MODEL. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02320.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.