The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS OF DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY: ANALYZING PATTERNS OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY WITH PROCRUSTES METHODS
Abstract
Although fluctuating asymmetry has become popular as a measure of developmental instability, few studies have examined its developmental basis. We propose an approach to investigate the role of development for morphological asymmetry by means of morphometric methods. Our approach combines geometric morphometrics with the two-way ANOVA customary for conventional analyses of fluctuating asymmetry and can discover localized features of shape variation by examining the patterns of covariance among landmarks. This approach extends the notion of form used in studies of fluctuating asymmetry from collections of distances between morphological landmarks to an explicitly geometric concept of shape characterized by the configuration of landmarks. We demonstrate this approach with a study of asymmetry in the wings of tsetse flies (Glossina palpalis gambiensis). The analysis revealed significant fluctuating and directional asymmetry for shape as well as ample shape variation among individuals and between the offspring of young and old females. The morphological landmarks differed markedly in their degree of variability but multivariate patterns of landmark covariation identified by principal component analysis were generally similar between fluctuating asymmetry (within-individual variability) and variation among individuals. Therefore there is no evidence that special developmental processes control fluctuating asymmetry. We relate some of the morphometric patterns to processes known to be involved in the development of fly wings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992207 · Cited by 4,289
Edgington, E., Edgington, E., & Onghena, P. (2007) · doi:10.1201/9781420011814 · Cited by 2,030
Cited by
Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry
Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M., & Meyer, A. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,109
Self-citationMorpho and Rvcg – Shape Analysis in R
Schlager, S. (2017) · Statistical Shape and Deformation Analysis · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-810493-4.00011-0 · Cited by 894
Morphological integration and developmental modularity
Klingenberg, C. P. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110054 · Cited by 863
Self-citationA field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21 st century
Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (2013) · Bollettino del CILEA (CILEA) · doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6283 · Cited by 722
Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability
Debat, V., & David, P. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02266-2 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Klingenberg, C. P., & McIntyre, G. S.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1363-1375
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334809670
- Cited by
- 807
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS OF DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY: ANALYZING PATTERNS OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY WITH PROCRUSTES METHODS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02018.x
- The paper
- Klingenberg, C. P., & McIntyre, G. S. (1998). GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS OF DEVELOPMENTAL INSTABILITY: ANALYZING PATTERNS OF FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY WITH PROCRUSTES METHODS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02018.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.