The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PERSPECTIVE: HIGHLY VARIABLE LOCI AND THEIR INTERPRETATION IN EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION
Abstract
Although highly variable loci, such as microsatellite loci, are revolutionizing both evolutionary and conservation biology, data from these loci need to be carefully evaluated. First, because these loci often have very high within-population heterozygosity, the magnitude of differentiation measures may be quite small. For example, maximum GST values for populations with no common alleles at highly variable loci may be small and are at maximum less than the average within-population homozygosity. As a result, measures that are variation independent are recommended for highly variable loci. Second, bottlenecks or a reduction in population size can generate large genetic distances in a short time for these loci. In this case, the genetic distance may be corrected for low variation in a population and tests to detect bottlenecks are advised. Third, statistically significant differences may not reflect biologically meaningful differences both because the patterns of adaptive loci may not be correlated with highly variable loci and statistical power with these markers is so high. As an example of this latter effect, the statistical power to detect a one-generation bottleneck of different sizes for different numbers of highly variable loci is discussed. All of these concerns need to be incorporated in the utilization and interpretation of patterns of highly variable loci for both evolutionary and conservation biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental correlates of population differentiation in Atlantic herring
Bekkevold, D., Aandré3, C., Dahlgren, T. G., Clausen, L. A. W., Torstensen, E., Mosegaard, H., Carvalho, G. R., Christensen, T. B., Norlinder, E., & Ruzzante, D. E. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00977.x · Cited by 1,223
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080
OLSEN, J. L., STAM, W. T., COYER, J. A., REUSCH, T. B. H., BILLINGHAM, M., BOSTRÖM, C., CALVERT, E., CHRISTIE, H., GRANGER, S., LUMIÈRE, R. L., et al. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02205.x · Cited by 291
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Markers in Conservation Biology
Ujvari, B., & Belov, K. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12085168 · Cited by 154
Genetic variation across the historical range of the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo)
Mock, K. E., Theimer, T. C., Rhodes, O. E., Greenberg, D. L., & Keim, P. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01467.x · Cited by 96
Gene Flow and Genetic Diversity of a Broadcast-Spawning Coral in Northern Peripheral Populations
Nakajima, Y., Nishikawa, A., Iguchi, A., & Sakai, K. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011149 · Cited by 82
Isolation by distance in the scleractinian coral Seriatopora hystrix from the Red Sea
Maier, E., Tollrian, R., Rinkevich, B., & Nürnberger, B. (2005) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0013-6 · Cited by 77
Basto, M. P., Santos-Reis, M., Simões, L., Grilo, C., Cardoso, L., Cortes, H., Bruford, M. W., & Fernandes, C. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145165 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedrick, P. W.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-318
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002682901
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.