The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PARASITE-MEDIATED SELECTION AGAINST INBRED SOAY SHEEP IN A FREE-LIVING ISLAND POPULATON
Abstract
Parasites are thought to provide a selective force capable of promoting genetic variation in natural populations. One rarely considered pathway for this action is via parasite-mediated selection against inbreeding. If parasites impose a fitness cost on their host and the offspring of close relatives have greater susceptibility to parasites due to the increased homozygosity that results from inbreeding, then parasite-mediated mortality may select against inbred individuals. This hypothesis has not yet been tested within a natural vertebrate population. Here we show that relatively inbred Soay sheep (Ovis aries), as assessed by microsatellite heterozygosity, are more susceptible to parasitism by gastrointestinal nematodes, with interactions indicating greatest susceptibility among adult sheep at high population density. During periods of high overwinter mortality on the island of Hirta, St. Kilda, Scotland, highly parasitised individuals were less likely to survive. More inbred individuals were also less likely to survive, which is due to their increased susceptibility to parasitism, because survival was random with respect to inbreeding among sheep that were experimentally cleared of their gastrointestinal parasite burden by anthelminthic treatment. As a consequence of this selection, average microsatellite heterozygosity increases with age in St. Kildan Soay sheep. We suggest that parasite-mediated selection acts to maintain genetic variation in this small island population by removing less heterozygous individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Cited by
The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers
Balloux, F., & Lugon‐Moulin, N. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01436.x · Cited by 1,208
The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation
Sommer, S. (2005) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-2-16 · Cited by 913
The Scent of Genetic Compatibility: Sexual Selection and the Major Histocompatibility Complex
Penn, D. J. (2002) · Ethology · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00768.x · Cited by 503
Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.
Meagher, S., Penn, D. J., & Potts, W. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.7.3324 · Cited by 322
Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory
Kempenaers, B. (2007) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(07)37005-8 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Coltman, D. W., Pilkington, J. G., Smith, J. A., & Pemberton, J. M.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1259-1267
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032301833
- Cited by
- 743
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PARASITE-MEDIATED SELECTION AGAINST INBRED SOAY SHEEP IN A FREE-LIVING ISLAND POPULATON. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04538.x
- The paper
- Coltman, D. W., Pilkington, J. G., Smith, J. A., & Pemberton, J. M. (1999). PARASITE-MEDIATED SELECTION AGAINST INBRED SOAY SHEEP IN A FREE-LIVING ISLAND POPULATON. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04538.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.