The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CORRELATED TROPHIC SPECIALIZATION AND GENETIC DIVERGENCE IN SYMPATRIC LAKE WHITEFISH ECOTYPES (COREGONUS CLUPEAFORMIS): SUPPORT FOR THE ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION HYPOTHESIS
Abstract
There is ample empirical evidence that phenotypic diversification in an adaptive radiation is the outcome of divergent natural selection related to differential resource use. In contrast, the role of ecological forces in favoring and maintaining reproductive isolation in nature remains poorly understood. If the same forces driving phenotypic divergence are also responsible for speciation, one would predict a correlation between the extent of trophic specialization (reflecting variable intensity of divergent natural selection) and that of reproductive isolation being reached in a given environment. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the extent of morphological and genetic differentiation between sympatric dwarf and normal whitefish ecotypes (Coregonus sp.) from six lakes of the St. John River basin (eastern Canada and northern Maine). Eight meristic variables, 19 morphometric variables, and six microsatellite loci were used to quantify morphological and genetic differentiation, respectively. Dwarf and normal ecotypes in each lake differed primarily by traits related to trophic specialization, but the extent of differentiation varied among lakes. Significant but variable genetic divergence between ecotypes within lakes was also observed. A negative correlation was observed between the extent of gene flow between ecotypes within a lake and that of their morphological differentiation in trophic-related traits. The extent of reproductive isolation reached between dwarf and normal whitefish ecotypes appears to be driven by the potential for occupying distinct trophic niches and, thus, by the same selective forces driving tropic specialization in each lake. These results therefore support the hypothesis of ecological speciation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
ESTIMATING F -STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE
Weir, B. S., & Cockerham, C. C. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x · Cited by 19,066
GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population Genetics Software for Exact Tests and Ecumenicism
Raymond, M., & Rousset, F. (1995) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573 · Cited by 15,397
Analyzing Tables of Statistical Tests
Rice, W. R. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409177 · Cited by 14,571
ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS
Rice, W. R. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x · Cited by 14,547
Statistical Methods for Research Workers
(1945) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/15.11.552b · Cited by 10,880
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967) · Cited by 6,573
Performing the Exact Test of Hardy-Weinberg Proportion for Multiple Alleles
Guo, S. W., & Thompson, E. A. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532296 · Cited by 4,880
Genetics and the Origin of Species
(1952) · AIBS Bulletin · doi:10.1093/aibsbulletin/2.2.14-b · Cited by 3,935
Endless Forms: Species and Speciation
Howard, D. J., & Berlocher, S. H. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,490
Cited by
Ecology and the origin of species
Schluter, D. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02198-x · Cited by 1,878
Host races in plant–feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation
Drès, M., & Mallet, J. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1059 · Cited by 909
The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow
Feder, J. L., Egan, S. P., & Nosil, P. (2012) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.009 · Cited by 832
Ecological and community‐wide character displacement: the next generation
Dayan, T., & Simberloff, D. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00791.x · Cited by 607
Nosil, P., Egan, S. P., & Funk, D. J. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00299.x · Cited by 600
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, G., & Bernatchez, L.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1491-1505
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985287990
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CORRELATED TROPHIC SPECIALIZATION AND GENETIC DIVERGENCE IN SYMPATRIC LAKE WHITEFISH ECOTYPES (COREGONUS CLUPEAFORMIS): SUPPORT FOR THE ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION HYPOTHESIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05413.x
- The paper
- Lu, G., & Bernatchez, L. (1999). CORRELATED TROPHIC SPECIALIZATION AND GENETIC DIVERGENCE IN SYMPATRIC LAKE WHITEFISH ECOTYPES (COREGONUS CLUPEAFORMIS): SUPPORT FOR THE ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION HYPOTHESIS. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05413.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.