The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE LOCI OF EVOLUTION: HOW PREDICTABLE IS GENETIC EVOLUTION?
Open accessAbstract
Is genetic evolution predictable? Evolutionary developmental biologists have argued that, at least for morphological traits, the answer is a resounding yes. Most mutations causing morphological variation are expected to reside in the cis-regulatory, rather than the coding, regions of developmental genes. This "cis-regulatory hypothesis" has recently come under attack. In this review, we first describe and critique the arguments that have been proposed in support of the cis-regulatory hypothesis. We then test the empirical support for the cis-regulatory hypothesis with a comprehensive survey of mutations responsible for phenotypic evolution in multicellular organisms. Cis-regulatory mutations currently represent approximately 22% of 331 identified genetic changes although the number of cis-regulatory changes published annually is rapidly increasing. Above the species level, cis-regulatory mutations altering morphology are more common than coding changes. Also, above the species level cis-regulatory mutations predominate for genes not involved in terminal differentiation. These patterns imply that the simple question "Do coding or cis-regulatory mutations cause more phenotypic evolution?" hides more interesting phenomena. Evolution in different kinds of populations and over different durations may result in selection of different kinds of mutations. Predicting the genetic basis of evolution requires a comprehensive synthesis of molecular developmental biology and population genetics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770 · cited 1×
“The temptation to tell adaptive stories about phenotypic traits has a long and checkered history in evolutionary biology (Gould and Lewontin 1979).”
BackgroundThe ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1090005 · Cited by 2,815
The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations
Wray, G. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2063 · Cited by 1,521
A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation
Haldane, J. B. S. (1927) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100015644 · Cited by 1,326
Gene Regulatory Networks and the Evolution of Animal Body Plans
Davidson, E. H., & Erwin, D. H. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113832 · Cited by 1,207 · cited 27×
“A hidden program in Drosophila peripheral neurogenesis revealed: fundamental principles underlying sensory organ diversity.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEvolution at Two Levels: On Genes and Form
Carroll, S. B. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030245 · Cited by 882
Cited by
Cis-regulatory elements: Molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence
Wittkopp, P. J., & Kalay, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3095 · Cited by 1,231
Adaptive Evolution of Pelvic Reduction in Sticklebacks by Recurrent Deletion of a Pitx1 Enhancer
Chan, Y. F., Marks, M. E., Jones, F. C., Villarreal, G., Shapiro, M. D., Brady, S. D., Southwick, A. M., Absher, D. M., Grimwood, J., Schmutz, J., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1182213 · Cited by 1,020
Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876
“…regulatory and coding regions, these meth-ods may fail to capture variation involved in gene regulation — such as enhancers and copy number variation — that may underlie the majority of adaptive phenotypic variation (Wray et al. 2003; Perry et al. 2007; Rockman 2012; Stern and Orgogozo 2008).”
The genetic causes of convergent evolution
Stern, D. L. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3483 · Cited by 818
Self-citationComparative studies of gene expression and the evolution of gene regulation
Romero, I. G., Ruvinsky, I., & Gilad, Y. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3229 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- Stern, D. L., & Orgogozo, V.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2155-2177
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2094005099
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 22.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE LOCI OF EVOLUTION: HOW PREDICTABLE IS GENETIC EVOLUTION? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00450.x
- The paper
- Stern, D. L., & Orgogozo, V. (2008). THE LOCI OF EVOLUTION: HOW PREDICTABLE IS GENETIC EVOLUTION? Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00450.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.