The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International Labour Review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Returns to Education: an updated international comparison
Psacharopoulos, G. (1981) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/0305006810170308 · Cited by 527
2 Old Assumptions, New Work: The Opportunities and Challenges of Research on Nonstandard Employment
Ashford, S. J., George, E., & Blatt, R. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/078559807 · Cited by 288
Consequences of Power Distance Orientation in Organisations
Khatri, N. (2009) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/097226290901300101 · Cited by 243
The impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns
Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315586594 · Cited by 95
Labour Process Theory and the New Digital Workplace
Briken, K., Chillas, S., Krzywdzinski, M., & Marks, A. (2017) · The New Digital Workplace · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-61014-0_1 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Venue
- International Labour Review
- Publisher
- Open Library of the Humanities
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 198-198
- ISSN
- 0020-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-913X
- OpenAlex
- W4299702055
- Cited by
- 1,525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 283.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Labour Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1564-913x.2009.00057.x
- The paper
- International Labour Review. (2009). International Labour Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913x.2009.00057.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
