Cited by 98Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBiofuel production and bioconversionFungal and yeast genetics research

Batch and continuous culture-based selection strategies for acetic acid tolerance in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Open access
Wright, Jeremiah, Bellissimi, Eleonora, de Hulster, Erik, Wagner, Andreas, Pronk, Jack T., van Maris, Antonius J. A.·2011·FEMS Yeast Research

Abstract

Acetic acid tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is crucial for the production of bioethanol and other bulk chemicals from lignocellulosic plant-biomass hydrolysates, especially at a low pH. This study explores two evolutionary engineering strategies for the improvement of acetic acid tolerance of the xylose-fermenting S. cerevisiae RWB218, whose anaerobic growth on xylose at pH 4 is inhibited at acetic acid concentrations >1 g L(-1) : (1) sequential anaerobic, batch cultivation (pH 4) at increasing acetic acid concentrations and (2) prolonged anaerobic continuous cultivation without pH control, in which acidification by ammonium assimilation generates selective pressure for acetic acid tolerance. After c. 400 generations, the sequential-batch and continuous selection cultures grew on xylose at pH≤4 with 6 and 5 g L(-1) acetic acid, respectively. In the continuous cultures, the specific xylose-consumption rate had increased by 75% to 1.7 g xylose g(-1) biomass h(-1) . After storage of samples from both selection experiments at -80 °C and cultivation without acetic acid, they failed to grow on xylose at pH 4 in the presence of 5 g L(-1) acetic acid. Characterization in chemostat cultures with linear acetic acid gradients demonstrated an acetate-inducible acetic acid tolerance in samples from the continuous selection protocol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00719.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, J., Bellissimi, E., de Hulster, E., Wagner, A., Pronk, J. T., & van Maris, A. J. A.
Affiliations
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Venue
FEMS Yeast Research
Published
2011-02-14
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
299-306
ISSN
1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155489855
Cited by
98
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • FEMS Yeast Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
acetic acid tolerance, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, xylose fermentation, evolutionary engineering, batch selection, continuous culture, lignocellulosic hydrolysates, low pH, ammonium assimilation, bioethanol production, chemostat
MeSH terms
Ethanol, Culture Media, Fermentation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Xylose, Biomass, Acetic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review