The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of Constipation in North America: A Systematic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the published literature regarding prevalence, risk factors, incidence, natural history, and the effect on quality of life of constipation in North America. METHODS: A computer-assisted search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents databases was performed independently by two investigators. Study selection criteria included the following: (1) North American population-based sample of adults with constipation; (2) publication in full manuscript form in English; and (3) report on the prevalence, incidence, and natural history of constipation or impact of constipation on quality of life. Eligible articles were reviewed in a duplicate, independent manner. Data extracted were compiled in tables and presented in descriptive form. RESULTS: The estimates of the prevalence of constipation in North America ranged from 1.9% to 27.2%, with most estimates from 12% to 19%. Prevalence estimates by gender support a female-to-male ratio of 2.2:1. Constipation appears to increase with increasing age, particularly after age 65. No true population-based incidence studies or natural history studies were identified. In one cohort, 89% of patients with constipation still reported constipation at 14.7 months follow-up. From limited data, quality of life appears to be diminished by constipation, but the clinical significance of this is unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation is very common, as approximately 63 million people in North America meet the Rome II criteria for constipation. Minimal data are available regarding incidence, natural history, and quality of life in patients with constipation. Effort should be expended toward the study of these topics, particularly in the elderly, who are disproportionately affected by this condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain
Thompson, W. G., Longstreth, G. F., Drossman, D. A., Heaton, K. W., Irvine, E. J., & Müller-Lissner, S. A. (1999) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.45.2008.ii43 · Cited by 2,440
Drossman, D. A., Li, Z., Andruzzi, E., Temple, R. D., Talley, N. J., Grant Thompson, W., Whitehead, W. E., Janssens, J., Funch-Jensen, P., Corazziari, E., et al. (1993) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01303162 · Cited by 2,198
Epidemiology of colonic symptoms and the irritable bowel syndrome
Talley, N. J., Zinsmeister, A. R., van Dyke, C., & Melton, L. J. (1991) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(91)90717-y · Cited by 648 · cited 2×
“Most individuals with self-reported constipation do not seek health care for constipation (11, 15, 17).”
BackgroundMethodBytzer, P., Talley, N. J., Leemon, M., Young, L. J., Jones, M. P., & Horowitz, M. (2001) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.161.16.1989 · Cited by 632
Some preliminary findings on physical complaints from a prospective study of 1,064,004 men and women
Hammond, E. C. (1964) · American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.54.1.11 · Cited by 401
Gastrointestinal tract symptoms among persons with diabetes mellitus in the community
Maleki, D., Locke, G. R., Camilleri, M., Zinsmeister, A. R., Yawn, B. P., Leibson, C., & Melton, L. J. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.18.2808 · Cited by 282
The impact of functional gastrointestinal disorders on quality of life
Koloski, N. A., Talley, N. J., & Boyce, P. M. (2000) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01735.x · Cited by 204 · cited 1×
“This is similar to population-based Australian data (43), in which SF-12 scores decreased by more than 5 points compared to individuals without FGID.”
Result
Cited by
Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective
JOHANSON, J. F., & KRALSTEIN, J. (2007) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03238.x · Cited by 617
Self-citationA placebo-controlled trial of prucalopride for severe chronic constipation
Camilleri, M., Kerstens, R., Rykx, A., & Vandeplassche, L. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0800670 · Cited by 576
Two randomized trials of linaclotide for chronic constipation
Lembo, A. J., Schneier, H. A., Shiff, S. J., Kurtz, C. B., MacDougall, J. E., Jia, X. D., Shao, J. Z., Lavins, B. J., Currie, M. G., Fitch, D. A., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1010863 · Cited by 373
Rao, S. S. C., Yu, S., & Fedewa, A. (2015) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.13167 · Cited by 343
Tack, J., van Outryve, M., Beyens, G., Kerstens, R., & Vandeplassche, L. (2009) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2008.162404 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Higgins, P. D., & Johanson, J. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 750-759
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2090144284
- Cited by
- 1,080
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Constipation in North America: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04114.x
- The paper
- Higgins, P. D., & Johanson, J. F. (2004). Epidemiology of Constipation in North America: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04114.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.