The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence
Abstract
DEFINITION Fecal incontinence is defined as either the involuntary passage or the inability to control the discharge of fecal matter through the anus. Clinically there are three subtypes (a) passive incontinence—the involuntary discharge of stool or gas without awareness; (b) urge incontinence—the discharge of fecal matter in spite of active attempts to retain bowel contents, and (c) fecal seepage—the leakage of stool following otherwise normal evacuation. The severity of incontinence can range from the unintentional elimination of flatus to the seepage of liquid fecal matter or sometimes the complete evacuation of bowel contents. Not surprisingly, these events cause considerable embarrassment, which in turn can lead to a loss of self-esteem, social isolation, and a diminished quality of life (1). EPIDEMIOLOGY Although fecal incontinence affects people of all ages, its prevalence is disproportionally higher in women, in the elderly, and in nursing home residents. Estimates of its prevalence vary greatly and depend on the clinical setting, the influence of social stigma, the definition of incontinence, and the frequency of occurrence. In the U.S. householder survey, frequent leakage of stool or fecal staining for more than 1 month was reported by 7.1% and 0.7% of the population, respectively (2). In contrast, two or more episodes of fecal incontinence per month were reported by 0.8% of patients presenting to primary care clinics in the UK (3). In an elderly (>65 yr) self-caring population, fecal incontinence occurred at least once a week in 3.7% of subjects and in more men than women (men:women = 1.5:1) (4). In contrast, 25–35% of institutionalized patients (5) and 10–25% of hospitalized geriatric patients (6) suffer from fecal incontinence. In the United States, fecal incontinence is the second leading cause for placement in nursing homes (6). In a survey of 2,570 households, comprising 6,959 individuals, the prevalence of at least one episode of incontinence during the previous year was 2.2%; among these 63% were women, 30% were >65 yr of age, 36% were incontinent of solid stool, 54% of liquid stool, and 60% of flatus (7). Furthermore, in another prospective survey of patients attending either a gastroenterology or a primary care clinic, over 18% reported fecal incontinence at least once a week (8). Only one third had ever discussed the problem with a physician (8). When stratified for the frequency of episodes, 2.7% of patients reported daily incontinence, 4.5% weekly, and 7.1% once per month (8). In another survey, fecal incontinence was associated with urinary incontinence in 26% of women attending a Uro/Gyn Clinic (9). A higher incidence of mixed fecal and urinary incontinence was also reported in nursing home residents (10, 11). The cost of health care related to fecal incontinence includes items that can be measured such as the evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of incontinence, medications, the use of disposable pads and other ancillary devices, skin care, and nursing care. Approximately $400 million/year were spent for adult diapers (8, 12) and between $1.5 and $7 billion/year were spent on care for incontinence among institutionalized elderly patients (6, 13). In a long-term facility, the annual cost for a patient with both mixed fecal and urinary incontinence was $9,711 (14). In the outpatient setting, the average cost per patient (including evaluation) was estimated at $17,166 (15). Additionally, there are other costs that cannot be measured such as the impaired quality of life and social dysfunction (1). SUMMARY. The prevalence of fecal incontinence ranges between 1% and 7.4% in otherwise healthy people and up to 25% in those who are institutionalized. Both the embarrassment and the social stigma attached to this disorder, often delay presentation as well as treatment for several years. Fecal incontinence not only causes significant morbidity in the community but it also consumes substantial health care resources. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY Functional Anatomy and Physiology of the Anorectum The neuromuscular integrity of the rectum, anus, and the adjoining pelvic floor musculature helps to maintain normal fecal continence. The rectum is a muscular tube composed of a continuous layer of longitudinal muscle that interlaces with the underlying circular muscle. This unique muscle arrangement enables the rectum to serve both as a reservoir for stool and as a pump for emptying stool. The anus is a muscular tube 2–4 cm. long, which at rest forms an angle with the axis of the rectum. At rest, the anorectal angle is approximately 90 degrees, with voluntary squeeze it becomes more acute, approximately 70 degrees, and during defecation it becomes more obtuse, about 110–130 degrees. The anal sphincter consists of the internal anal sphincter, which is a 0.3–0.5 cm thick expansion of the circular smooth muscle layer of the rectum, and the anal sphincter which is a cm thick expansion of the both are and The anus is by
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cochrane database of systematic reviews
Geddes, J. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(96)90063-x · Cited by 5,989
Etiology and management of fecal incontinence
Jorge, M. J. N., & Wexner, S. D. (1993) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02050307 · Cited by 2,985
Drossman, D. A., Li, Z., Andruzzi, E., Temple, R. D., Talley, N. J., Grant Thompson, W., Whitehead, W. E., Janssens, J., Funch-Jensen, P., Corazziari, E., et al. (1993) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01303162 · Cited by 2,198
Anal-Sphincter Disruption during Vaginal Delivery
Sultan, A. H., Kamm, M. A., Hudson, C. N., Thomas, J. M., & Bartram, C. I. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312233292601 · Cited by 1,533
Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems
Vaizey, C. J., Carapeti, E., Cahill, J. A., & Kamm, M. A. (1999) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.44.1.77 · Cited by 1,372
Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.
Parks, A. G., & Nicholls, R. J. (1978) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.6130.85 · Cited by 1,355
Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema
Malone, P. S., Ransley, P. G., & Kiely, E. M. (1990) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)92834-5 · Cited by 859
Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.
Shorvon, P. J., McHugh, S., Diamant, N. E., Somers, S., & Stevenson, G. W. (1989) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.30.12.1737 · Cited by 765
Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair
Sultan, A. H., Kamm, M. A., Hudson, C. N., & Bartram, C. I. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6933.887 · Cited by 761
Community-Based Prevalence of Anal Incontinence
Nelson, R. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530070057030 · Cited by 709
Cited by
Chronic Constipation in the Elderly
Bouras, E. P., & Tangalos, E. G. (2009) · Gastroenterology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2009.06.001 · Cited by 275
Musa, M. K., Saga, S., Blekken, L. E., Harris, R., Goodman, C., & Norton, C. (2019) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.03.033 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, S. S. C.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1585-1604
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2172290329
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 107
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40105.x
- The paper
- Rao, S. S. C. (2004). Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40105.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.