The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increased Risk of Intestinal Cancer in Crohn's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Cohort Studies
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The risk of intestinal malignancy in Crohn's disease (CD) remains uncertain since risk estimates vary worldwide. The global CD population is growing and there is a demand for better knowledge of prognosis of this disease. Hence, the aim of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis of population-based data on intestinal cancer risk in CD. METHODS: The MEDLINE search engine and abstracts from international conferences were searched for the relevant literature by use of explicit search criteria. All papers fulfilling the strict inclusion criteria were scrutinized for data on population size, time of follow-up, and observed to expected cancer rates. STATA meta-analysis software was used to perform overall pooled risk estimates (standardized incidence ratio (SIR), observed/expected) and meta-regression analyses of the influence of specific variables on SIR. RESULTS: Six papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria and reported SIRs of colorectal cancer (CRC) in CD varying from 0.9 to 2.2. The pooled SIR for CRC was significantly increased (SIR, 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.5), as was the risk for colon cancer separately (SIR, 2.5; 95% CI 1.7-3.5). Regarding small bowel cancer, five studies reported SIRs ranging from 3.4 to 66.7, and the overall pooled estimate was 27.1 (95% CI 14.9-49.2). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis of intestinal cancer risk in CD, based on population-based studies only, revealed an overall increased risk of both CRC and small bowel cancer among patients with CD. However, some of the available data were several decades old, and future studies taking new treatment strategies into account are required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lamb, C. A., Kennedy, N. A., Raine, T., Hendy, P. A., Smith, P. J., Limdi, J. K., Hayee, B., Lomer, M. C. E., Parkes, G. C., Selinger, C., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484 · Cited by 2,346
Jess, T., Rungoe, C., & Peyrin–Biroulet, L. (2012) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.01.010 · Cited by 958
Self-citationObesity and cancer: the role of dysfunctional adipose tissue
van Kruijsdijk, R. C. M., van der Wall, E., & Visseren, F. L. J. (2009) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0372 · Cited by 715
Axelrad, J. E., Lichtiger, S., & Yajnik, V. (2016) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4794 · Cited by 431
Beaugerie, L., Svrcek, M., Seksik, P., Bouvier, A., Simon, T., Allez, M., Brixi, H., Gornet, J., Altwegg, R., Beau, P., et al. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.03.044 · Cited by 363
Dietary Emulsifier–Induced Low-Grade Inflammation Promotes Colon Carcinogenesis
Viennois, E., Merlin, D., Gewirtz, A. T., & Chassaing, B. (2017) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-1359 · Cited by 268
Sato, Y., Tsujinaka, S., Miura, T., Kitamura, Y., Suzuki, H., & Shibata, C. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15164154 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Jess, T., Gamborg, M., Matzen, P., Munkholm, P., & Sorensen, T. I. A.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2724-2729
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2093332642
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.