Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Risk of Retention of the Capsule Endoscope in Patients with Known or Suspected Crohn's Disease

Cheifetz, Adam S., Kornbluth, Asher A., Legnani, Peter, Schmelkin, Ira, Brown, Alphonso, Lichtiger, Simon, Lewis, Blair S.·2006·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Capsule endoscopy (CE) allows visualization of the mucosa of the entire small bowel and is therefore a potentially important tool in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease (CD). However, small bowel strictures, which are not uncommon in Crohn's, are considered to be a contraindication to CE for fear of capsule retention. Our goal was to determine the risk of capsule retention in patients with suspected or known CD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 983 CE cases performed at three private gastroenterology practices between December 2000 and December 2003, and selected those with suspected or proven Crohn's. RESULTS: A total of 102 cases were identified in which CE was used in patients with suspected (N = 64) or known (N = 38) CD. Only one of 64 patients (1.6%) with suspected CD had a retained capsule. However, in five of 38 (13%) patients with known Crohn's, the capsule was retained proximal to a stricture. Of the five cases of retained capsules, three strictures were previously unknown. In four cases, the obstructing lesions were resected without complications, leading to complete resolution of the patient's underlying symptoms. One patient chose not to undergo surgery and has remained without an episode of small bowel obstruction for over 38 months. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule retention occurred in 13% (95% CI 5.6%-28%) of patients with known CD, but only in 1.6% (95% CI 0.2%-10%) with suspected Crohn's. A retained capsule may indicate unsuspected strictures in Crohn's that may require an unexpected, but therapeutic, surgical intervention. Patients and physicians should be aware of these potential risks when using CE in CD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00761.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Cheifetz, A. S., Kornbluth, A. A., Legnani, P., Schmelkin, I., Brown, A., Lichtiger, S., & Lewis, B. S.
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2006-10
Volume
101
Issue
10
Pages
2218-2222
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W1998851912
Cited by
364
References
0
FWCI
16.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Risk of Retention of the Capsule Endoscope in Patients with Known or Suspected Crohn's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00761.x
The paper
Cheifetz, A. S., Kornbluth, A. A., Legnani, P., Schmelkin, I., Brown, A., Lichtiger, S., & Lewis, B. S. (2006). The Risk of Retention of the Capsule Endoscope in Patients with Known or Suspected Crohn's Disease. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00761.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.