The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-Resolution Manometry of the EGJ: An Analysis of Crural Diaphragm Function in GERD
Abstract
AIM: High-resolution manometry (HRM) provides a spatially enhanced, dynamic representation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) high-pressure zone making it possible to isolate the crural diaphragm (CD) contraction from expiratory lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. This study compared CD function of subjects with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: A total of 75 asymptomatic controls and 156 GERD patients (EGD or pH monitoring positive) underwent HRM. The EGJ axial pressure profile was analyzed over five respiratory cycles to quantify the position and contractile vigor of the CD relative to the LES. Correlations between EGJ HRM attributes and GERD status were examined. RESULTS: GERD patients had significantly greater CD-LES separation compared with either controls or EGD-/pH- patients. GERD patients also had significantly less inspiratory augmentation of EGJ pressure (EGD-/pH+, 11.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg; EGD+, 10.0 +/- 1.2 mmHg) compared with controls (16.9 +/- 1 mmHg) or EGD-/pH- patients (16.7 +/- 0.2 mmHg). Using a logistic regression model that simultaneously examined expiratory LES pressure, LES-CD separation, and inspiratory EGJ augmentation while controlling for age and BMI, only inspiratory augmentation had a significant independent association with GERD. CONCLUSIONS: HRM characterization of EGJ morphology correlates with the objective demonstration of GERD. Although both LES pressure and LES-CD separation are associated with GERD, the strongest association and the only independent predictor of GERD as a categorical outcome in a logistic regression analysis was impaired CD function as indicated by reduced inspiratory augmentation of EGJ pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus
Gyawali, C. P., Kahrilas, P. J., Savarino, E., Zerbib, F., Mion, F., Smout, A. J. P. M., Vaezi, M., Sifrim, D., Fox, M. R., Vela, M. F., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationEsophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©
Yadlapati, R., Kahrilas, P. J., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A. J., Prakash Gyawali, C., Roman, S., Babaei, A., Mittal, R. K., Rommel, N., Savarino, E., et al. (2021) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.14058 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationFood and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Surdea-Blaga, T., Negrutiu, D. E., Palage, M., & Dumitrascu, D. L. (2019) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867324666170515123807 · Cited by 101
Esophageal motor dysfunctions in gastroesophageal reflux disease and therapeutic perspectives
Lin, S., Li, H., & Fang, X. (2019) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm19081 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandolfino, J. E., Kim, H., Ghosh, S. K., Clarke, J. O., Zhang, Q., & Kahrilas, P. J.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1056-1063
- ISSN
- 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-0241
- OpenAlex
- W2039062591
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Resolution Manometry of the EGJ: An Analysis of Crural Diaphragm Function in GERD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01138.x
- The paper
- Pandolfino, J. E., Kim, H., Ghosh, S. K., Clarke, J. O., Zhang, Q., & Kahrilas, P. J. (2007). High-Resolution Manometry of the EGJ: An Analysis of Crural Diaphragm Function in GERD. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01138.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.