Cited by 1,197Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health EducationInflammatory Bowel Disease

A Systematic Review of Patient Inflammatory Bowel Disease Information Resources on the World Wide Web

Bernard, André, Langille, Morgan, Hughes, Stephanie, Rose, Caren, Leddin, Desmond, Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Sander·2007·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Internet is a widely used information resource for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, but there is variation in the quality of Web sites that have patient information regarding Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The purpose of the current study is to systematically evaluate the quality of these Web sites. METHODS: The top 50 Web sites appearing in Google using the terms "Crohn's disease" or "ulcerative colitis" were included in the study. Web sites were evaluated using a (a) Quality Evaluation Instrument (QEI) that awarded Web sites points (0-107) for specific information on various aspects of inflammatory bowel disease, (b) a five-point Global Quality Score (GQS), (c) two reading grade level scores, and (d) a six-point integrity score. RESULTS: Thirty-four Web sites met the inclusion criteria, 16 Web sites were excluded because they were portals or non-IBD oriented. The median QEI score was 57 with five Web sites scoring higher than 75 points. The median Global Quality Score was 2.0 with five Web sites achieving scores of 4 or 5. The average reading grade level score was 11.2. The median integrity score was 3.0. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variation in the quality of the Web sites containing information on Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Many Web sites suffered from poor quality but there were five high-scoring Web sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernard, A., Langille, M., Hughes, S., Rose, C., Leddin, D., & Veldhuyzen van Zanten, S.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2007-09
Volume
102
Issue
9
Pages
2070-2077
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W1963659399
Cited by
1,197
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 359 · 2025: 211 · 2024: 169 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, patient information resources, health information websites, website quality evaluation, Global Quality Score, reading level, patient education
MeSH terms
Humans, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Information Storage and Retrieval, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review