Cited by 44Social Media in Health EducationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityHealth Education and Validation

Evaluating the reliability and quality of knee osteoarthritis educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis

Open access
Tu, Jiakuan, Zhang, Chaoxiang, Zhang, Hao, Liang, Likan, He, Jianhua·2025·DIGITAL HEALTH

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), a prevalent degenerative joint disease, burdens global health. Amid the digital era, patients increasingly seek KOA-related information on TikTok and Bilibili, but its quality is scarcely studied, raising accuracy, and reliability concerns. Aim: To systematically evaluate the reliability and quality of KOA educational videos on TikTok and Bilibili using validated tools (modified DISCERN and Global Quality Score, GQS), and to analyze associations between content quality, uploader types, and user engagement metrics. Methods: Using “Knee Osteoarthritis” as the keyword, the top 100 videos from each platform were retrieved. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant videos, 164 were analyzed. Videos were classified by uploader type and content. Two senior orthopedic physicians evaluated their reliability and quality via a modified DISCERN tool and GQS. Nonparametric statistical methods were applied for data analysis. Results: Bilibili had a significantly higher proportion of high-quality videos (GQS ≥4: 38.0% vs. 11.8%; DISCERN ≥4: 49.3% vs. 24.7%, P < 0.05). Professional institutions’ videos ranked highest, while TikTok was mostly run by professional uploaders (with medical or healthcare-related qualifications) (98%). Disease knowledge and treatment were the main content types. Engagement metrics were intercorrelated but not with quality scores. Conclusion: Bilibili hosted more high-quality KOA videos than TikTok (GQS ≥4: 38.0% vs. 11.8%, DISCERN ≥4: 49.3% vs. 24.7%, P < 0.05), with professional institutions showing the highest reliability. Engagement metrics did not correlate with quality. To mitigate misinformation, targeted strategies—such as platform-specific guidelines for health content and integration of video quality discussions into clinical consultations—are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20552076251366390

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Tu, J., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Liang, L., & He, J.
Affiliations
  • Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Department of Orthopedic Trauma I, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang 330003, China.
Corresponding author
He, Jianhua
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Published
2025-05
Volume
11
Pages
20552076251366390-20552076251366390
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413115683
Cited by
44
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 4
FWCI
49.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
knee osteoarthritis, health misinformation, educational videos, TikTok, Bilibili, content quality, reliability, mDISCERN, Global Quality Score, user engagement, social media health information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review