The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of social networks on hybrid seed adoption in India
Abstract
This article adds to the literature about the impact of social networks on the adoption of modern seed technologies among smallholder farmers in developing countries. The analysis centers on the adoption of hybrid wheat and hybrid pearl millet in India. In the local context, both crops are cultivated mainly on a subsistence basis, and they provide examples of hybrid technologies at very different diffusion stages: while hybrid wheat was commercialized in India only in 2001, hybrid pearl millet was launched in 1965. The analysis is based on surveys of wheat and millet farmers in the state of Maharashtra. Comprehensive data on farmer characteristics and social interactions allow for identifying individual networks, thereby improving upon previous research approaches that employed village‐level variables as proxies for network effects. Using econometric models, we find that individual social networks play an important role for technology adoption decisions. While village‐level variables may be used as suitable proxies at later diffusion stages, they tend to underestimate the role of individual networks during early phases of adoption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/451461 · Cited by 3,482
Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture
Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1995) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/601447 · Cited by 2,038
Cited by
Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya
Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018 · Cited by 836
Self-citationTakahashi, K., Muraoka, R., & Otsuka, K. (2020) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12539 · Cited by 444
Measuring Social Networks' Effects on Agricultural Technology Adoption
Maertens, A., & Barrett, C. B. (2013) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aas049 · Cited by 370
Verhofstadt, E., & Maertens, M. (2015) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppu021 · Cited by 271
‘Spillovers from conservation programs’
Pfaff, A., & Robalino, J. (2017) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053543 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Matuschke, I., & Qaim, M.
- Venue
- Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-18
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 493-505
- ISSN
- 0169-5150 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-0862
- OpenAlex
- W2004264912
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of social networks on hybrid seed adoption in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00393.x
- The paper
- Matuschke, I., & Qaim, M. (2009). The impact of social networks on hybrid seed adoption in India. Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00393.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.