The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region
Open accessAbstract
PCR amplification of 16S rDNA was found to be highly biased, so that the rDNA from one species out of four was preferentially amplified. We present evidence that the observed PCR bias most likely occurs because the genomic DNA of some species contains segments outside the amplified sequence that inhibit the initial PCR steps. Attempts to overcome this bias by use of a ‘touch down’ PCR procedure or by performing PCR in the presence of denaturants or cosolvents such as acetamide, DMSO, or glycerol were unsuccessful. Since the PCR inhibiting interference from template flanking DNA segments evidently is dependent on the position of the primer sites, we suggest that community diversity analysis based on PCR amplification of 16S rDNA can be improved by extending the procedure from comparative analysis of 16S rDNA amplified by use of only one primer set to a procedure involving at least two different 16S rDNA PCR amplifications performed with different primer sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies
Schloss, P. D., Gevers, D., & Westcott, S. L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 · Cited by 2,112
Lueders, T., & Friedrich, M. W. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.1.320-326.2003 · Cited by 320
The tragedy of the uncommon: understanding limitations in the analysis of microbial diversity
Bent, S. J., & Forney, L. J. (2008) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.44 · Cited by 314
Identifying biases and their potential solutions in human microbiome studies
Nearing, J. T., Comeau, A. M., & Langille, M. G. I. (2021) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01059-0 · Cited by 240
Ben-Dov, E., Shapiro, O. H., Siboni, N., & Kushmaro, A. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00849-06 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, M.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-149
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166130574
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6496(98)00031-2
- The paper
- Hansen, M. (1998). Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking the template region. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6496(98)00031-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.