The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of PCR Amplification Bias by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Small-Subunit rRNA and mcrA Genes by Using Defined Template Mixtures of Methanogenic Pure Cultures and Soil DNA Extracts
Open accessAbstract
Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis is a widely used method for profiling microbial community structure in different habitats by targeting small-subunit (SSU) rRNA and also functional marker genes. It is not known, however, whether relative gene frequencies of individual community members are adequately represented in post-PCR amplicon frequencies as shown by T-RFLP. In this study, precisely defined artificial template mixtures containing genomic DNA of four different methanogens in various ratios were prepared for subsequent T-RFLP analysis. PCR amplicons were generated from defined mixtures targeting not only the SSU rRNA but also the methyl-coenzyme M reductase ( mcrA/mrtA ) genes of methanogens. Relative amplicon frequencies of microorganisms were quantified by comparing fluorescence intensities of characteristic terminal restriction fragments. SSU ribosomal DNA (rDNA) template ratios in defined template mixtures of the four-membered community were recovered absolutely by PCR-T-RFLP analysis, which demonstrates that the T-RFLP analysis evaluated can give a quantitative view of the template pool. SSU rDNA-targeted T-RFLP analysis of a natural community was found to be highly reproducible, independent of PCR annealing temperature, and unaffected by increasing PCR cycle numbers. Ratios of mcrA -targeted T-RFLP analysis were biased, most likely by PCR selection due to the degeneracy of the primers used. Consequently, for microbial community analyses, each primer system used should be evaluated carefully for possible PCR bias. In fact, such bias can be detected by using T-RFLP analysis as a tool for the precise quantification of the PCR product pool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics
Stackebrandt, E. S., & Goodfellow, M. (1991) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 9,460
Heid, C. A., Stevens, J., Livak, K. J., & Williams, P. M. (1996) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6.10.986 · Cited by 6,174
Liu, W. T., Marsh, T. L., Cheng, H., & Forney, L. J. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.11.4516-4522.1997 · Cited by 2,251
Complete Genome Sequence of the Methanogenic Archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii
Bult, C. J., White, O., Olsen, G. J., Zhou, L., Fleischmann, R. D., Sutton, G. G., Blake, J. A., FitzGerald, L. M., Clayton, R. A., Gocayne, J. D., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1058 · Cited by 2,082
Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
v. Wintzingerode, F. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(97)00057-0 · Cited by 2,063
Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR
Suzuki, M. T., & Giovannoni, S. J. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.2.625-630.1996 · Cited by 1,881
Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR
Polz, M. F., & Cavanaugh, C. M. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.10.3724-3730.1998 · Cited by 1,484
(2006) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420015201 · Cited by 1,294
Suzuki, M. T., Taylor, L. T., & DeLong, E. F. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.11.4605-4614.2000 · Cited by 1,191
Development and application of nucleic acid probes
Stahl, D. A. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 912
Cited by
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Acinas, S. G., Sarma-Rupavtarm, R., Klepac-Ceraj, V., & Polz, M. F. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8966-8969.2005 · Cited by 625
Steinberg, L. M., & Regan, J. M. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00553-08 · Cited by 435
Experimental tests of the bacterial distance–decay relationship
Bell, T. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.77 · Cited by 255
Küng, D., Bigler, L., Davis, L. R., Gratwicke, B., Griffith, E., & Woodhams, D. C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087101 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Lueders, T., & Friedrich, M. W.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 320-326
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2031274779
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 27.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of PCR Amplification Bias by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Small-Subunit rRNA and mcrA Genes by Using Defined Template Mixtures of Methanogenic Pure Cultures and Soil DNA Extracts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.1.320-326.2003
- The paper
- Lueders, T., & Friedrich, M. W. (2003). Evaluation of PCR Amplification Bias by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Small-Subunit rRNA and mcrA Genes by Using Defined Template Mixtures of Methanogenic Pure Cultures and Soil DNA Extracts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.1.320-326.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.