The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial community structures in honeybee intestines and their response to two insecticidal proteins: Bacterial community of honeybee guts
Open accessAbstract
In this study, the effects of the Bt-toxin Cry1Ab and a soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI) on intestinal bacterial communities of adult honeybees (Apis mellifera) were investigated. It was hypothesized that changes in intestinal bacterial communities of honeybees may represent a sensitive indicator for altered intestinal physiology. Honeybees were fed in a laboratory set-up with maize pollen from the Bt-transgenic cultivar MON810 or from the non-transgenic near isoline. Purified Cry1Ab (0.0014% w/v) and SBTI (0.1% or 1% w/v) represented supplementary treatments. For comparison, free-flying honeybees from two locations in Switzerland were analysed. PCR-amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses revealed a total of 17 distinct terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs), which were highly consistent between laboratory-reared and free-flying honeybees. The T-RFs were affiliated to Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria, to Firmicutes, and to Bacteriodetes. Neither Bt-maize pollen nor high concentrations of Cry1Ab significantly affected bacterial communities in honeybee intestines. Only the high concentration of SBTI significantly reduced the number of T-RFs detected in honeybee midguts, a concentration that also increases bee mortality. Therefore, total bacterial community structures may not be a sensitive indicator for providing evidence for the impact of insecticidal proteins on honeybees at sublethal levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic, Ecological, Food Safety, and Social Consequences of the Deployment of Bt Transgenic Plants
Shelton, A. M., Zhao, J.-Z., & Roush, R. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145309 · Cited by 794
Cited by
vanEngelsdorp, D., & Meixner, M. D. (2010) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.011 · Cited by 1,254
Functional diversity within the simple gut microbiota of the honey bee
Engel, P., Martinson, V. G., & Moran, N. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1202970109 · Cited by 874
Establishment of Characteristic Gut Bacteria during Development of the Honeybee Worker
Martinson, V. G., Moy, J., & Moran, N. A. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.07810-11 · Cited by 587
Do diet and taxonomy influence insect gut bacterial communities?
Colman, D. R., Toolson, E. C., & Takacs‐Vesbach, C. D. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05752.x · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Babendreier, D., Joller, D., Romeis, J., Bigler, F., & Widmer, F.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 600-610
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W1941713626
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial community structures in honeybee intestines and their response to two insecticidal proteins: Bacterial community of honeybee guts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00249.x
- The paper
- Babendreier, D., Joller, D., Romeis, J., Bigler, F., & Widmer, F. (2007). Bacterial community structures in honeybee intestines and their response to two insecticidal proteins: Bacterial community of honeybee guts. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00249.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.