The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in plant roots are not random assemblages: Selectivity in AMF-plant associations
Open accessAbstract
We investigated whether arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities in plant roots are random subsets of the local taxon pool or whether they reflect the action of certain community assembly rules. We studied AMF small subunit rRNA gene sequence groups in the roots of plant individuals belonging to 11 temperate forest understorey species. Empirical data were compared with null models assuming random association. Distinct fungal species pools were present in young and old successional forest. In both forest types, the richness of plant-AMF associations was lower than expected by chance, indicating a degree of partner selectivity. AMF communities were generally not characteristic of individual plant species, but those associated with ecological groups of plant species - habitat generalists and forest specialists - were nonrandom subsets of the available pool of fungal taxa and differed significantly from each other. Moreover, these AMF communities were the least distinctive in spring, but developed later in the season. Comparison with a global database showed that generalist plants tend to associate with generalist AMF. Thus, the habitat range of the host and a possible interaction with season played a role in the assembly of AMF communities in individual plant root systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Classen, A. T., Sundqvist, M. K., Henning, J. A., Newman, G. S., Moore, J. A. M., Cregger, M. A., Moorhead, L. C., & Patterson, C. M. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es15-00217.1 · Cited by 654
Fifty thousand years of Arctic vegetation and megafaunal diet
Willerslev, E., Davison, J., Moora, M., Zobel, M., Coissac, E., Edwards, M. E., Lorenzen, E. D., Vestergård, M., Gussarova, G., Haile, J., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12921 · Cited by 569
Self-citationBiodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ecosystem function
Powell, J. R., & Rillig, M. C. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15119 · Cited by 508
The Potential Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Restoration of Degraded Lands
Asmelash, F., Bekele, T., & Birhane, E. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01095 · Cited by 294
Thijs, S., Sillen, W., Rineau, F., Weyens, N., & Vangronsveld, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00341 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Davison, J., Öpik, M., Daniell, T. J., Moora, M., & Zobel, M.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-11
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-115
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1951201638
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in plant roots are not random assemblages: Selectivity in AMF-plant associations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01103.x
- The paper
- Davison, J., Öpik, M., Daniell, T. J., Moora, M., & Zobel, M. (2011). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in plant roots are not random assemblages: Selectivity in AMF-plant associations. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01103.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.