The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phylogenetic characterization of bacteria in the gut of house flies (Musca domestica L.)
Open accessAbstract
House flies (Musca domestica L.) are cosmopolitan, ubiquitous, synanthropic insects that serve as mechanical or biological vectors for various microorganisms. To fully assess the role of house flies in the epidemiology of human diseases, it is essential to understand the diversity of microbiota harbored by natural fly populations. This study aimed to identify the diversity of house fly gut bacteria by both culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches. A total of 102 bacterial strains were isolated from the gut of 65 house flies collected from various public places including a garden, public park, garbage/dump area, public toilet, hospital, restaurant/canteen, mutton shop/market, and house/human habitation. Molecular phylogenetic analyses placed these isolates into 22 different genera. The majority of bacteria identified were known potential pathogens of the genera Klebsiella, Aeromonas, Shigella, Morganella, Providencia, and Staphylococcus. Culture-independent methods involved the construction of a 16S rRNA gene clone library, and sequence analyses supported culture recovery results. However, additional bacterial taxa not determined via culture recovery were revealed using this methodology and included members of the classes Alphaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, and the phylum Bacteroidetes. Here, we show that the house fly gut is an environmental reservoir for a vast number of bacterial species, which may have impacts on vector potential and pathogen transmission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Significance and Roles of Proteus spp. Bacteria in Natural Environments
Drzewiecka, D. (2016) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-015-0720-6 · Cited by 363
Mazza, L., Xiao, X., ur Rehman, K., Cai, M., Zhang, D., Fasulo, S., Tomberlin, J. K., Zheng, L., Soomro, A. A., Yu, Z., et al. (2020) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.055 · Cited by 126
Identification of Bacteria in Two Food Waste Black Soldier Fly Larvae Rearing Residues
Gold, M., von Allmen, F., Zurbrügg, C., Zhang, J., & Mathys, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.582867 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, A. K., Nayduch, D., Verma, P., Shah, B., Ghate, H. V., Patole, M. S., & Shouche, Y. S.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-12-12
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 581-593
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972192890
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic characterization of bacteria in the gut of house flies (Musca domestica L.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01248.x
- The paper
- Gupta, A. K., Nayduch, D., Verma, P., Shah, B., Ghate, H. V., Patole, M. S., & Shouche, Y. S. (2012). Phylogenetic characterization of bacteria in the gut of house flies (Musca domestica L.). FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01248.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.