Cited by 203Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusGenetic diversity and population structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tracing isolates of bacterial species by multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA)

Open access
Van Belkum, Alex·2007·FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology

Abstract

All bacterial genomes contain multiple loci of repetitive DNA. Repeat unit sizes and repeat sequences may vary when multiple loci are considered for different isolates of an individual microbial species. Moreover, it has been documented on many occasions that the number of repeat units per locus is a strain-defining parameter. Consequently, there is isolate-specificity in the number of repeats per locus when different strains of a given bacterial species are compared. The experimental assessment of this variability for a number of different loci has been called 'multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis' (MLVA). The approach can be supported or extended by locus-specific DNA sequencing for establishing mutations in the individual repeat units, which usually enhances the resolution of the approach considerably. Essentially, MLVA with or without supportive sequencing has been developed for all of the medically relevant bacterial species and can be used effectively for tracing outbreaks or other forms of bacterial dissemination. MLVA is a modern, timely and versatile bacterial typing methodology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-695x.2006.00173.x

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Van Belkum, A.
Venue
FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology
Published
2007-02
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
22-27
ISSN
  • 0928-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-695X
OpenAlex
W2085293610
Cited by
203
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
MLVA, strain typing, bacterial genotyping, repetitive DNA, outbreak source tracing, bacterial dissemination
MeSH terms
Bacillus anthracis, Bacteria, DNA, Bacterial, Humans, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Genome, Bacterial, Minisatellite Repeats, Bioterrorism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review