The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Polysaccharide breakdown by mixed populations of human faecal bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Measurements of polysaccharide-degrading activity in different fractions of human faeces showed that bacterial polysaccharidases and glycosidases were primarily associated with the washed bacterial fractions. Amylase, pectinase and xylanase were the major polysaccharide-hydrolysing enzymes detected, whilst α-l-arabinofuranosidase, β-d-xylosidase, β-d-galactosidase and β-d-glucosidase were the most active glycosidases. Starch and 3 non-starch polysaccharides (NSP; pectin, xylan and arabinogalactan) were fermented by mixed populations of human faecal bacteria in batch culture. Detailed carbohydrate analysis demonstrated that starch and pectin were the most rapidly degraded substrates and that arabinogalactan and the relatively insoluble polysaccharide xylan were broken down more slowly. Free sugars and oligosaccharides did not accumulate in culture media with any polysaccharide tested. Time-course measurements of polysaccharide remaining in the batch culture fermentations showed that the arabinose side chains of pectin, xylan and arabinogalactan were co-utilised with the backbone sugars. In these cultures, polysaccharide-degrading activity was mainly cell-associated, but extracellular polysaccharidase activity increased as the fermentations progressed. Molar ratios of acetate, propionate and butyrate produced in these experiments were dependent upon the polysaccharide substrate tested. Molar ratios of acetate, propionate and butyrate in the starch, arabinogalactan, xylan and pectin fermentations were 50:22:29, 50:42:8, 82:15:3, and 84:14:2, respectively. The presence of starch did not inhibit the breakdown of arabinogalactan, xylan or pectin by faecal bacterial, providing evidence that multicomponent substrate utilisation occurs when complex populations of faecal bacteria are provided with mixed polysaccharide substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Colonic Health: Fermentation and Short Chain Fatty Acids
Wong, J. M. W., de Souza, R., Kendall, C. W. C., Emam, A., & Jenkins, D. J. A. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/00004836-200603000-00015 · Cited by 2,739
Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production
Macfarlane, S., & Macfarlane, G. T. (2003) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2002207 · Cited by 1,939
Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota
Holscher, H. D. (2017) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2017.1290756 · Cited by 1,808
The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon
Cummings, J. H., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1991) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb02739.x · Cited by 1,499
Nondigestible carbohydrates, butyrate, and butyrate-producing bacteria
Fu, X., Liu, Z., Zhu, C., Mou, H., & Kong, Q. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1542587 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- Englyst, H.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 163-171
- ISSN
- 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160360243
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polysaccharide breakdown by mixed populations of human faecal bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0378-1097(87)90013-9
- The paper
- Englyst, H. (1987). Polysaccharide breakdown by mixed populations of human faecal bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(87)90013-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.