The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aeons of distress: an evolutionary perspective on the bacterial SOS response
Open accessAbstract
The SOS response of bacteria is a global regulatory network targeted at addressing DNA damage. Governed by the products of the lexA and recA genes, it co-ordinates a comprehensive response against DNA lesions and its description in Escherichia coli has stood for years as a textbook paradigm of stress-response systems in bacteria. In this paper we review the current state of research on the SOS response outside E. coli. By retracing research on the identification of multiple diverging LexA-binding motifs across the Bacteria Domain, we show how this work has led to the description of a minimum regulon core, but also of a heterogeneous collection of SOS regulatory networks that challenges many tenets of the E. coli model. We also review recent attempts at reconstructing the evolutionary history of the SOS network that have cast new light on the SOS response. Exploiting the newly gained knowledge on LexA-binding motifs and the tight association of LexA with a recently described mutagenesis cassette, these works put forward likely evolutionary scenarios for the SOS response, and we discuss their relevance on the ultimate nature of this stress-response system and the evolutionary pressures driving its evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes
Beaber, J. W., Hochhut, B., & Waldor, M. K. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02241 · Cited by 1,186
The SOS response regulates adaptive mutation
McKenzie, G. J., Harris, R. S., Lee, P. L., & Rosenberg, S. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.120161797 · Cited by 295
Bacterial SOS Checkpoint Protein SulA Inhibits Polymerization of Purified FtsZ Cell Division Protein
Trusca, D., Scott, S., Thompson, C., & Bramhill, D. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.15.3946-3953.1998 · Cited by 187 · cited 1×
“Most notably, induction of the sulA gene inhibits septum formation by interacting with the ftsZ gene product, leading to filamentation (Trusca et al., 1998), and the rationale for this process seems to lie in delaying cell division until DNA damage has been properly addressed.”
BackgroundRand, L., Hinds, J., Springer, B., Sander, P., Buxton, R. S., & Davis, E. O. (2003) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03765.x · Cited by 154
An SOS-regulated operon involved in damage-inducible mutagenesis in Caulobacter crescentus
Galhardo, R. S. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki551 · Cited by 125
Cited by
Staphylococcal response to oxidative stress
Gaupp, R., Ledala, N., & Somerville, G. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2012.00033 · Cited by 253
Hibshman, J. D., Clark-Hachtel, C. M., Bloom, K. S., & Goldstein, B. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114956 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Erill, I., Campoy, S., & Barbé, J.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 637-656
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W1977516923
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aeons of distress: an evolutionary perspective on the bacterial SOS response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00082.x
- The paper
- Erill, I., Campoy, S., & Barbé, J. (2007). Aeons of distress: an evolutionary perspective on the bacterial SOS response. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00082.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.