The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tissue engineering of cultured skin substitutes
Open accessAbstract
Skin replacement has been a challenging task for surgeons ever since the introduction of skin grafts by Reverdin in 1871. Recently, skin grafting has evolved from the initial autograft and allograft preparations to biosynthetic and tissue-engineered living skin replacements. This has been fostered by the dramatically improved survival rates of major burns where the availability of autologous normal skin for grafting has become one of the limiting factors. The ideal properties of a temporary and a permanent skin substitute have been well defined. Tissue-engineered skin replacements: cultured autologous keratinocyte grafts, cultured allogeneic keratinocyte grafts, autologous/allogeneic composites, acellular biological matrices, and cellular matrices including such biological substances as fibrin sealant and various types of collagen, hyaluronic acid etc. have opened new horizons to deal with such massive skin loss. In extensive burns it has been shown that skin substitution with cultured grafts can be a life-saving measure where few alternatives exist. Future research will aim to create skin substitutes with cultured epidermis that under appropriate circumstances may provide a wound cover that could be just as durable and esthetically acceptable as conventional split-thickness skin grafts. Genetic manipulation may in addition enhance the performance of such cultured skin substitutes. If cell science, molecular biology, genetic engineering, material science and clinical expertise join their efforts to develop optimized cell culture techniques and synthetic or biological matrices then further technical advances might well lead to the production of almost skin like new tissue-engineered human skin products resembling natural human skin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rheinwald, J. G., Hahn, W. C., Ramsey, M. R., Wu, J. Y., Guo, Z., Tsao, H., De Luca, M., Catricalà, C., & O'Toole, K. M. (2002) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.22.14.5157-5172.2002 · Cited by 338
Supp, D. M., Supp, A. P., Boyce, S. T., & Bell, S. M. (2000) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00824.x · Cited by 120
Cited by
The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue
Pampaloni, F., Reynaud, E. G., & Stelzer, E. H. K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2236 · Cited by 2,817
Fibrin: A versatile scaffold for tissue engineering applications
Ahmed, T. A. E., Dare, E. V., & Hincke, M. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2007.0435 · Cited by 994
Biomaterials for stem cell differentiation
Dawson, E., Mapili, G., Erickson, K., Taqvi, S., & Roy, K. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.037 · Cited by 448
Applications and degradation of proteins used as tissue engineering materials
Wang, H.-J., Di, L., Ren, Q.-S., & Wang, J.-Y. (2009) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma2020613 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Horch, R. E., Kopp, J., Kneser, U., Beier, J., & Bach, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 592-608
- ISSN
- 1582-1838 (ISSN-L)
- 1582-4934
- OpenAlex
- W2087508173
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tissue engineering of cultured skin substitutes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00491.x
- The paper
- Horch, R. E., Kopp, J., Kneser, U., Beier, J., & Bach, A. D. (2005). Tissue engineering of cultured skin substitutes. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00491.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.