Cited by 2,8173D Printing in Biomedical ResearchCellular Mechanics and InteractionsCell Image Analysis Techniques

The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue

Pampaloni, Francesco, Reynaud, Emmanuel G., Stelzer, Ernst H. K.·2007·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

Moving from cell monolayers to three-dimensional (3D) cultures is motivated by the need to work with cellular models that mimic the functions of living tissues. Essential cellular functions that are present in tissues are missed by 'petri dish'-based cell cultures. This limits their potential to predict the cellular responses of real organisms. However, establishing 3D cultures as a mainstream approach requires the development of standard protocols, new cell lines and quantitative analysis methods, which include well-suited three-dimensional imaging techniques. We believe that 3D cultures will have a strong impact on drug screening and will also decrease the use of laboratory animals, for example, in the context of toxicity assays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrm2236

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two-dimensional monolayer cultures cannot replicate the stratified epidermis and lack 3D cell-to-cell and extracellular matrix interactions.

    “Moreover, 2D monolayer cultures are constrained by their inability to replicate the stratified epidermis and lack of 3D cell-to-cell/ECM (extracellular matrix) interactions [7].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pampaloni, F., Reynaud, E. G., & Stelzer, E. H. K.
Affiliations
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Stelzer, Ernst H. K.
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2007-10
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
839-845
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W2033474014
Cited by
2,817
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 120 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 166 · 2022: 183 · 2021: 225 · 2020: 202 · 2019: 189 · 2018: 233 · 2017: 211 · 2016: 225 · 2015: 181 · 2014: 157 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 86
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
3D cell culture, cell monolayers, 3D imaging, cell-based drug screening, toxicity assays, animal use reduction, cell lines
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Adhesion, Cell Movement, Humans, Cell Culture Techniques, Tissue Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review