Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 497

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endothelial progenitor cells: identity defined?

Open access
Timmermans, Frank, Plum, Jean, Yöder, Mervin C., Ingram, David A., Vandekerckhove, Bart, Case, Jamie·2009·Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Introduction The proof‐of‐concept in vivo: the cell, the read‐out and the animal model EPCs defined in vitro: the achilles heel in EPC biology Summary In the past decade, researchers have gained important insights on the role of bone marrow (BM)‐derived cells in adult neovascularization. A subset of BM‐derived cells, called endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), has been of particular interest, as these cells were suggested to home to sites of neovascularization and neoendothelialization and differentiate into endothelial cells (ECs) in situ, a process referred to as postnatal vasculogenesis. Therefore, EPCs were proposed as a potential regenerative tool for treating human vascular disease and a possible target to restrict vessel growth in tumour pathology. However, conflicting results have been reported in the field, and the identification, characterization, and exact role of EPCs in vascular biology is still a subject of much discussion. The focus of this review is on the controversial issues in the field of EPCs which are related to the lack of a unique EPC marker, identification challenges related to the paucity of EPCs in the circulation, and the important phenotypical and functional overlap between EPCs, haematopoietic cells and mature ECs. We also discuss our recent findings on the origin of endothelial outgrowth cells (EOCs), showing that this in vitro defined EC population does not originate from circulating CD133+ cells or CD45+ haematopoietic cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00598.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 497

Metadata

Authors
Timmermans, F., Plum, J., Yöder, M. C., Ingram, D. A., Vandekerckhove, B., & Case, J.
Venue
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
87-102
ISSN
  • 1582-1838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1582-4934
OpenAlex
W1979485167
Cited by
497
References
9
FWCI
18.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endothelial progenitor cells: identity defined? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00598.x
The paper
Timmermans, F., Plum, J., Yöder, M. C., Ingram, D. A., Vandekerckhove, B., & Case, J. (2009). Endothelial progenitor cells: identity defined? Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00598.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.