CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 185Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and Psychiatry

Hallucinations in schizophrenia

Mueser, K. T., Bellack, A. S., Brady, E. U.·1990·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01350.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The prevalence of different types of hallucinations and their clinical correlates were examined in 117 DSM-III-R schizophrenic or schizoaffective disorder patients. Auditory hallucinations were by far the most common, followed by visual hallucinations, and then by tactile and olfactory or gustatory hallucinations. Auditory hallucinations were associated with an earlier age of first hospitalization among the schizophrenics. Global severity of the illness for schizophrenics was related to the presence of visual hallucinations, but not other types of hallucinations. Tactile and olfactory or gustatory hallucinations were strongly correlated with each other and with the severity of delusions for both schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients. The results suggest that important clinical differences exist between patients with different types of hallucinations, and that these clinical variables need to be controlled for in cross-cultural studies of hallucinations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01350.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adult patients with schizophrenia are more concerned by auditory compared with visual hallucinations.

    “Importantly, while VIs provide a privileged access to the visual hallucinatory modality, readers should note that adult patients who suffer from schizophrenia are more concerned by auditory compared with visual hallucinations (Mueser et al., 1990; Blom, 2010).”

    From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Mueser et al., 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Mueser, K. T., Bellack, A. S., & Brady, E. U.
Corresponding author
Mueser, K. T.
ORCID
Mueser, K. T.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-07
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
26-29
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
DOI
10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01350.x
OpenAlex
W2012808200
Cited by
185
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 6262 d)
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health (5u10mh039998-08)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-39998, MH-38636)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
hallucinations, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, tactile hallucinations, disease severity, delusions, cross-cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Delusions, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review