Cited by 25Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and Psychiatry

Hallucinations, neuroplasticity, and prediction errors in schizophrenia

Open access
McCleery, Amanda, Wynn, Jonathan K., Green, Michael F.·2018·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Auditory hallucinations, a hallmark symptom of psychosis, are experienced by most people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia at some point in their illness. Auditory hallucinations can be understood as a failure in predictive coding, whereby abnormalities in sensory/perceptual processing combine with biased cognitive processes to result in a dampening of normal prediction error signaling. In this paper, we used a roving mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm to optimize evaluation of prediction error signaling and short‐term neuroplasticity in 30 people with schizophrenia (n = 16 with and n = 14 without recent auditory hallucinations) and 20 healthy comparison participants. The recent hallucinations group exhibited an abnormal roving MMN profile [F(2,27) = 3.98, p = 0.03], significantly reduced prediction error signaling [t(28) = –2.25, p = 0.03], and a trend for diminished short‐term neuroplasticity [t(28) = 1.80, p = 0.08]. There were no statistically significant differences between the healthy comparison group and the combined schizophrenia group on any of the roving MMN indices. These findings are consistent with a predictive coding account of hallucinations in schizophrenia, which posits reduced prediction error signaling in those who are prone to hallucinations. These results also suggest that plasticity‐mediated formation and online updating of predictive coding models may also be disrupted in individuals with recent hallucinations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sjop.12413

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In SCZ, both negative and positive symptoms negatively correlate with flexibility and the ability to maintain the working memory trace.

    “Clinically, both negative and positive symptoms were found to negatively correlate with flexibility and the ability to maintain the working memory trace (Leptourgos et al., 2022; McCleery et al., 2018).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as McCleery et al., 2018

    The Results report that, within the schizophrenia group, overall psychiatric symptom scores were not significantly correlated with either repetition positivity or the memory trace effect. The paper does report a reduced memory trace effect in patients with recent hallucinations, but it does not establish the claimed negative correlations for both positive and negative symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Schizophrenia patients with recent auditory hallucinations showed reduced repetition effects compared to schizophrenia patients without recent auditory hallucinations.

    “They found reduced repetition effects in schizophrenia patients with recent auditory hallucinations when compared to schizophrenia patients without recent auditory hallucinations (32).”

    From A Predictive Coding Perspective on Mismatch Negativity Impairment in Schizophrenia (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results section reports lower repetition positivity in schizophrenia patients with recent auditory hallucinations than in those without, but describes the difference as a tendency that was not statistically significant (p=0.08). The Discussion likewise calls it a tendency toward reduced short-term plasticity, so the unqualified claim overstates the finding. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lukoff D Nuechterlein KH Ventura J 1986 Manual for the expanded brief psychiatric rating scale Schizophrenia Bulletin 12 4 594 602

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCleery, A., Wynn, J. K., & Green, M. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
McCleery, Amanda
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-22
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
41-48
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2792321642
Cited by
25
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K23MH108829, T32MH096682)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, auditory hallucinations, predictive coding, perceptual processing, psychosis
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Brain, Electroencephalography, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Neuropsychological Tests, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review