The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risperidone versus haloperidol in the treatment of chronic schizophrenic inpatients: a multicentre double‐blind comparative study
Abstract
Forty‐four chronic schizophrenic inpatients participated in this multicentre 12‐week parallel‐group double‐blind trial. After a run‐in period of 2 weeks and a single‐blind placebo wash‐out of 1 week, they were randomly assigned to treatment with either the serotonin 2 and dopamine‐D 2 antagonist risperidone or haloperidol. Two patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Five patients dropped out in the haloperidol group and 1 in the risperidone group. At the end of the trial, the mean daily dose was 12 mg for risperidone and 10 mg for haloperidol. The risperidone group showed greater improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia – change version, and the Nurses’ Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation. The improvement of negative symptoms was more pronounced in the risperidone group until week 8 of double‐blind treatment. The consumption of antiparkinsonian medication was 10 times lower with risperidone. Both drugs were well tolerated and the laboratory, endocrinological and cardiovascular safety parameters were comparable. This study suggests that risperidone is comparable to haloperidol as an antipsychotic, but that it has a safer EPS profile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
Dopamine Receptor Binding Predicts Clinical and Pharmacological Potencies of Antischizophrenic Drugs
Creese, I., Burt, D. R., & Snyder, S. H. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3854 · Cited by 2,220
Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics
Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A., & Lindenmayer, J.-P. (1988) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(88)90038-8 · Cited by 1,007
Cited by
Delayed-Onset Hypothesis of Antipsychotic Action: A Hypothesis Tested and Rejected
Agid, O., Kapur, S., Arenovich, T., & Zipursky, R. B. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.12.1228 · Cited by 408
Leysen, J. E., Janssen, P. M. F., Schotte, A., Luyten, W. H. M. L., & Megens, A. A. H. P. (1993) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245006 · Cited by 334
Falkai, P., Wobrock, T., Lieberman, J., Glenthoj, B., Gattaz, W. F., Möller, H.-J., WFSBP Task Force on Treatment Guide, Falkai, P., Wobrock, T., Lieberman, J., et al. (2006) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622970500483177 · Cited by 331
Atypical antipsychotics: new directions and new challenges in the treatment of schizophrenia
Kapur, S., & Remington, G. (2001) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.503 · Cited by 324
Mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs: a critical analysis
Kinon, B. J., & Lieberman, J. A. (1996) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245602 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Claus, A., Bollen, J., Cuyper, H. D., Eneman, M., Malfroid, M., Peuskens, J., & Heylen, S.
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 295-305
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0447
- OpenAlex
- W2044278535
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risperidone versus haloperidol in the treatment of chronic schizophrenic inpatients: a multicentre double‐blind comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb01473.x
- The paper
- Claus, A., Bollen, J., Cuyper, H. D., Eneman, M., Malfroid, M., Peuskens, J., & Heylen, S. (1992). Risperidone versus haloperidol in the treatment of chronic schizophrenic inpatients: a multicentre double‐blind comparative study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb01473.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.