The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive training in Alzheimer's disease: a meta‐analysis of the literature
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review the literature and summarize the effect of cognitive training (CT) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients on multiple functional domains. Method: Effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated for 17 controlled studies identified through a comprehensive literature review. Results: An overall effect size of 0.47 was observed for all CT strategies across all measured outcomes. Mean effect sizes were higher for restorative (0.54) than for compensatory (0.36) strategies. Domain‐specific effect sizes ranged from 2.16 (verbal and visual learning) to −0.38 (visuospatial functioning). Data are also presented on the relative impact of restorative and compensatory strategies for each domain of functioning. Conclusion: CT evidenced promise in the treatment of AD, with primarily medium effect sizes for learning, memory, executive functioning, activities of daily living, general cognitive problems, depression, and self‐rated general functioning. Restorative strategies demonstrated the greatest overall effect on functioning. Several limitations of the published literature are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clare, L., & Woods, B. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003260 · Cited by 576
Coping With Dementia: Evaluation of Four Nonpharmacologic Interventions
Quayhagen, M. P., Quayhagen, M., Corbeil, R. R., Hendrix, R. C., Jackson, J. E., Snyder, L., & Bower, D. (2000) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610200006360 · Cited by 225
Cited by
Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia
Woods, B., Aguirre, E., Spector, A. E., & Orrell, M. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005562.pub2 · Cited by 855
Cognitive Mechanisms of Treatment in Depression
Roiser, J. P., Elliott, R., & Sahakian, B. J. (2012) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2011.183 · Cited by 535
Bahar-Fuchs, A., Clare, L., & Woods, B. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003260.pub2 · Cited by 507
Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia
Bahar-Fuchs, A., Martyr, A., Goh, A. M., Sabates, J., & Clare, L. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013069.pub2 · Cited by 342
Motter, J. N., Pimontel, M. A., Rindskopf, D., Devanand, D. P., Doraiswamy, P. M., & Sneed, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.022 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Sitzer, D. I., Twamley, E. W., & Jeste, D. V.
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-15
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-90
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0447
- OpenAlex
- W2162941887
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
