Cited by 128Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchMigration, Health and Trauma

Validity of ‘post‐traumatic stress disorder with secondary psychotic features’: a review of the evidence

Braakman, M. H., Kortmann, F. A. M., Van Den Brink, W.·2009·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: To review the evidence from empirical studies regarding the validity of ‘post‐traumatic stress disorder with secondary psychotic features’ (PTSD‐SP) as a separate diagnostic entity. Method: The authors performed a review tracing publications between 1980 and January 2008. Results: Twenty‐four comparative studies were included. These studies indicate that PTSD‐SP is a syndrome that comprises PTSD‐symptoms followed in time by the additional appearance of psychotic features. The psychotic features are not confined to episodes of re‐experiencing, but remain present continuously. PTSD‐SP seems to have some biological features differentiating it from schizophrenia and PTSD, e.g. there are differences in smooth pursuit eye movement patterns, concentrations of corticotropin‐releasing factor and dopamine β‐hydroxylase activity. Conclusion: There is currently not yet full support for PTSD‐SP as a nosological entity. However, the delineation of PTSD‐SP from other psychiatric syndromes is notable and biological studies seem to support the validity as a separate diagnostic entity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01252.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braakman, M. H., Kortmann, F. A. M., & Van Den Brink, W.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Braakman, M. H.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-09
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
15-24
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2076583633
Cited by
128
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
diagnostic validity, disease classification, psychotic features, schizophrenia, smooth pursuit eye movements, corticotropin-releasing factor, dopamine beta-hydroxylase, re-experiencing
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Delusions, Diagnosis, Differential, Hallucinations, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Reality Testing, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review