The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analytic review of neurocognition in bipolar II disorder: Cognition and BD II
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The clinical distinction between bipolar II disorder (BD II) and bipolar I disorder (BD I) is not clear-cut. Cognitive functioning offers the potential to explore objective markers to help delineate this boundary. To examine this issue, we conducted a quantitative review of the cognitive profile of clinically stable patients with BD II in comparison with both patients with BD I and healthy controls. METHOD: Meta-analytical methods were used to compare cognitive functioning of BD II disorder with both BD I disorder and healthy controls. RESULTS: Individuals with BD II were less impaired than those with BD I on verbal memory. There were also small but significant difference in visual memory and semantic fluency. There were no significant differences in global cognition or in other cognitive domains. Patients with BD II performed poorer than controls in all cognitive domains. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that with the exception of memory and semantic fluency, cognitive impairment in BD II is as severe as in BD I. Further studies are needed to investigate whether more severe deficits in BD I are related to neurotoxic effects of severe manic episodes on medial temporal structures or neurobiological differences from the onset of the illness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395 · cited 2×
“Egger s test did not show evidence for Processing speed Phonetic fluency (41), semantic fluency (41), TMT (42), Stroop (41), symbol coding (43) Attention Continuos performance test (44) Working memory Digit span (43), LNS (43), spatial span (41), PASAT (45) Reasoning and problem solving WCST (46), ToL (47), progressiv…”
BackgroundIdentification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia
Nuechterlein, K. H., Barch, D. M., Gold, J. M., Goldberg, T. E., Green, M. F., & Heaton, R. K. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.007 · Cited by 1,304
Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., Schettler, P. J., Coryell, W., Endicott, J., Maser, J. D., Solomon, D. A., Leon, A. C., & Keller, M. B. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.3.261 · Cited by 1,243
Bax, L., Yu, L.-M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, H., & Moons, K. G. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-50 · Cited by 514 · cited 1×
“Meta-analyses were performed using mix software (54).”
Evidence for theory of mind deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder
Bora, E., Vahip, S., Gonul, A. S., Akdeniz, F., Alkan, M., Ogut, M., & Eryavuz, A. (2005) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00570.x · Cited by 291
Self-citationTaylor Tavares, J. V., Clark, L., Cannon, D. M., Erickson, K., Drevets, W. C., & Sahakian, B. J. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.034 · Cited by 262
Bipolar II disorder: arguments for and against a distinct diagnostic entity
Vieta, E., & Suppes, T. (2008) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00561.x · Cited by 200
Smith, D. J., Muir, W. J., & Blackwood, D. H. (2006) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00275.x · Cited by 170
Berk, M., & Dodd, S. (2005) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00152.x · Cited by 134
Self-citationFacial emotion recognition in patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder
Derntl, B., Seidel, E., Kryspin‐Exner, I., Hasmann, A., & Dobmeier, M. (2009) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466509x404845 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Snyder, H. R., Miyake, A., & Hankin, B. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00328 · Cited by 946
Bora, E., & Pantelis, C. (2015) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu198 · Cited by 341
Self-citationBiomarkers and clinical staging in psychiatry
McGorry, P., Keshavan, M., Goldstone, S., Amminger, P., Allott, K., Berk, M., Lavoie, S., Pantelis, C., Yung, A., Wood, S., et al. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20144 · Cited by 306
Self-citationThe C factor: cognitive dysfunction as a transdiagnostic dimension in psychopathology
Abramovitch, A., Short, T., & Schweiger, A. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102007 · Cited by 269
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion
Lima, I. M. M., Peckham, A. D., & Johnson, S. L. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Bora, E., Yücel, M., Pantelis, C., & Berk, M.
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-24
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165-174
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1718781463
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-analytic review of neurocognition in bipolar II disorder: Cognition and BD II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01638.x
- The paper
- Bora, E., Yücel, M., Pantelis, C., & Berk, M. (2011). Meta-analytic review of neurocognition in bipolar II disorder: Cognition and BD II. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01638.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
