Cited by 170Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neurocognitive impairment in euthymic young adults with bipolar spectrum disorder and recurrent major depressive disorder

Smith, Daniel J, Muir, Walter J, Blackwood, Douglas HR·2006·Bipolar Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Patients with remitted major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder have persistent impairments in executive function and verbal memory that may represent endophenotypic abnormalities. In this study, we examine neurocognitive function in a sample of euthymic young adults with bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD) (Can J Psychiatry 2002; 47: 125–134) and compare this to well‐matched samples of young adults with recurrent MDD and controls. Method: Twenty‐one euthymic young adult patients with BSD were compared with 42 young adult patients with MDD and 33 controls on a neuropsychological battery assessing attention, executive function and verbal memory. Results: Patients with BSD were significantly more impaired than MDD patients and controls on tests of executive function and verbal memory. MDD patients did not differ significantly from controls on verbal memory function but performed less well on a test of executive function. Conclusion: Euthymic young adults with BSD had greater impairment on neurocognitive measures associated with prefrontal and hippocampal function than MDD patients and controls. This is a reflection of a strong bipolar diathesis in the BSD group rather than being a consequence of a more severe unipolar illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00275.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, D. J., Muir, W. J., & Blackwood, D. H.
Affiliations
Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-12
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
40-46
ISSN
  • 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5618
OpenAlex
W2122040483
Cited by
170
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University of Glasgow
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
bipolar spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, euthymia, neurocognitive impairment, executive function, verbal memory, attention, endophenotypes, prefrontal function, hippocampal function, young adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Recurrence, Verbal Learning, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review