Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predominant recurrence polarity among 928 adult international bipolar I disorder patients

Open access
Baldessarini, R. J., Undurraga, J., Vázquez, G. H., Tondo, L., Salvatore, P., Ha, K., Khalsa, H.‐M. K., Lepri, B., Ha, T. H., Chang, J. S., Tohen, M., Vieta, E.·2012·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Baldessarini RJ, Undurraga J, Vázquez GH, Tondo L, Salvatore P, Ha K, Khalsa H‐MK, Lepri B, Ha TH, Chang JS, Tohen M, Vieta E. Predominant recurrence polarity among 928 adult international bipolar I disorder patients. Objective: To test the hypothesis that patients with bipolar disorder (BPD) differ demographically and clinically within subgroups based on the predominant‐polarity of major recurrences. Method: We tested factors for association with predominantly (≥2 : 1) depressive vs. mania‐like episodes with 928 DSM‐IV type‐I BPD subjects from five international sites. Results: Factors preliminarily associated with predominant‐depression included: electroconvulsive treatment, longer latency‐to‐BPD diagnosis, first episode depressive or mixed, more suicide attempts, more Axis‐II comorbidity, ever having mixed‐states, ever married, and female sex. Predominant‐mania was associated with: initial manic or psychotic episodes, more drug abuse, more education, and more family psychiatric history. Of the 47.3% of subjects without polarity‐predominance, risks for all factors considered were intermediate. Expanding the definition of polarity‐predominance to ≥51% added little, but shifting mixed‐states to ‘predominant‐depression’ increased risk of suicidal acts from 2.4‐ to 4.5‐fold excess over predominant‐mania–hypomania, and suicidal risk was associated continuously with increasing proportions of depressive or mixed episodes. Conclusion: Subtyping by predominant‐polarity yielded predictive associations, including the polarity of first episodes and risk of suicide attempts. Such subtyping may contribute to improve planning of clinical care and to biological studies of BPD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01818.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Baldessarini, R. J., Undurraga, J., Vázquez, G. H., Tondo, L., Salvatore, P., Ha, K., Khalsa, H. ‐. K., Lepri, B., Ha, T. H., Chang, J. S., Tohen, M., & Vieta, E.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-21
Volume
125
Issue
4
Pages
293-302
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W1521280119
Cited by
162
References
5
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predominant recurrence polarity among 928 adult international bipolar I disorder patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01818.x
The paper
Baldessarini, R. J., Undurraga, J., Vázquez, G. H., Tondo, L., Salvatore, P., Ha, K., Khalsa, H. ‐. K., Lepri, B., Ha, T. H., Chang, J. S., Tohen, M., & Vieta, E. (2012). Predominant recurrence polarity among 928 adult international bipolar I disorder patients. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01818.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.